197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33323077)
1. Determining cancer risk: the evolutionary multistage model or total stem cell divisions?
Nunney L; Thai K
Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Dec; 287(1941):20202291. PubMed ID: 33323077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peto's paradox and the hallmarks of cancer: constructing an evolutionary framework for understanding the incidence of cancer.
Nunney L; Muir B
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Jul; 370(1673):. PubMed ID: 26056359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward an evolutionary model of cancer: Considering the mechanisms that govern the fate of somatic mutations.
Rozhok AI; DeGregori J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jul; 112(29):8914-21. PubMed ID: 26195756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peto's paradox and human cancers.
Noble R; Kaltz O; Hochberg ME
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Jul; 370(1673):. PubMed ID: 26056357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Size matters: height, cell number and a person's risk of cancer.
Nunney L
Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 285(1889):. PubMed ID: 30355711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The hierarchical model of stem cell genesis explains the man mouse paradox, Peto's paradox, the red cell paradox and Wright's enigma.
Morris JA
Med Hypotheses; 2014 Dec; 83(6):713-7. PubMed ID: 25459141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The multiple facets of Peto's paradox: a life-history model for the evolution of cancer suppression.
Brown JS; Cunningham JJ; Gatenby RA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Jul; 370(1673):. PubMed ID: 26056365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The real war on cancer: the evolutionary dynamics of cancer suppression.
Nunney L
Evol Appl; 2013 Jan; 6(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 23396311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lack of Correlation between Stem-Cell Proliferation and Radiation- or Smoking-Associated Cancer Risk.
Little MP; Hendry JH; Puskin JS
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150335. PubMed ID: 27031507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can Peto's paradox be used as the null hypothesis to identify the role of evolution in natural resistance to cancer? A critical review.
Ducasse H; Ujvari B; Solary E; Vittecoq M; Arnal A; Bernex F; Pirot N; Misse D; Bonhomme F; Renaud F; Thomas F; Roche B
BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():792. PubMed ID: 26499116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Peto's "Paradox" and Six Degrees of Cancer Prevalence.
Szasz A
Cells; 2024 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 38275822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cancer etiology: Variation in cancer risk among tissues is poorly explained by the number of gene mutations.
López-Lázaro M
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2018 Jun; 57(6):281-293. PubMed ID: 29377495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resolving Peto's paradox: Modeling the potential effects of size-related metabolic changes, and of the evolution of immune policing and cancer suppression.
Nunney L
Evol Appl; 2020 Aug; 13(7):1581-1592. PubMed ID: 32821274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cancer suppression and the evolution of multiple retrogene copies of TP53 in elephants: A re-evaluation.
Nunney L
Evol Appl; 2022 May; 15(5):891-901. PubMed ID: 35603034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cancer etiology. Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions.
Tomasetti C; Vogelstein B
Science; 2015 Jan; 347(6217):78-81. PubMed ID: 25554788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Natural resistance to cancers: a Darwinian hypothesis to explain Peto's paradox.
Roche B; Hochberg ME; Caulin AF; Maley CC; Gatenby RA; Misse D; Thomas F
BMC Cancer; 2012 Sep; 12():387. PubMed ID: 22943484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Critical Examination of the "Bad Luck" Explanation of Cancer Risk.
Rozhok AI; Wahl GM; DeGregori J
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2015 Sep; 8(9):762-4. PubMed ID: 26122457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The population genetics of multistage carcinogenesis.
Nunney L
Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Jun; 270(1520):1183-91. PubMed ID: 12816658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Substantial contribution of extrinsic risk factors to cancer development.
Wu S; Powers S; Zhu W; Hannun YA
Nature; 2016 Jan; 529(7584):43-7. PubMed ID: 26675728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An epidemiologic perspective on the stem cell hypothesis in human carcinogenesis.
Schottenfeld D
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 50(Pt A):132-136. PubMed ID: 28910694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
