These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33324292)

  • 1. Regulatory Fit Demonstrates That Prohibitive Voice Does Not Lead to Low Performance Evaluation.
    Yang L
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():581162. PubMed ID: 33324292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impact of Paradoxical Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model.
    Li X; Xue Y; Liang H; Yan D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():537756. PubMed ID: 33071857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voice Contributes to Creativity via Leaders' Endorsement Especially When Proposed by Extraverted High Performance Employees.
    Shu M; Zhong Z; Ren H
    Psychol Res Behav Manag; 2022; 15():213-226. PubMed ID: 35136358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When and Why Leaders' Helping Behavior Promotes Employees' Thriving: Exploring the Role of Voice Behavior and Perceived Leader's Role Overload.
    Chen L; Zhang ZD; Jia WT
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():553512. PubMed ID: 33101127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Organizational adaptation to working from home in a crisis situation (COVID-19): the interaction between leaders' openness and followers' voice.
    Buzás B; Faragó K
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1181807. PubMed ID: 37303893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. I Would Speak Up to Live Up to Your Trust: The Role of Psychological Safety and Regulatory Focus.
    Song Y; Peng P; Yu G
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2966. PubMed ID: 32038371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How Does Paradoxical Leadership Affect Employees' Voice Behaviors in Workplace? A Leader-Member Exchange Perspective.
    Xue Y; Li X; Liang H; Li Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32059578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linking Abusive Supervision to Promotive and Prohibitive Voice Behavior: Testing the Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Negative Reciprocity.
    Wu J; Du Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 35564896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Role Theory Perspective on How and When Goal-Focused Leadership Influences Employee Voice Behavior.
    Qian J; Li X; Wang B; Song B; Zhang W; Chen M; Qu Y
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1244. PubMed ID: 30093874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feeling Trusted or Feeling Used? The Relationship Between Perceived Leader Trust, Reciprocation Wariness, and Proactive Behavior.
    Ye S; Xiao Y; Wu S; Wu L
    Psychol Res Behav Manag; 2021; 14():1461-1472. PubMed ID: 34588826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Organizational Socialization of New Employees on Team Innovation Performance: A Cross-Level Model.
    Liao G; Zhou J; Yin J
    Psychol Res Behav Manag; 2022; 15():1017-1031. PubMed ID: 35480713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dispositional antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice.
    Kakkar H; Tangirala S; Srivastava NK; Kamdar D
    J Appl Psychol; 2016 Sep; 101(9):1342-51. PubMed ID: 27599091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The content of the message matters: The differential effects of promotive and prohibitive team voice on team productivity and safety performance gains.
    Li AN; Liao H; Tangirala S; Firth BM
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Aug; 102(8):1259-1270. PubMed ID: 28358532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Inhibitory Effect of Perceived Organizational Politics on Employee Voice Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model.
    Liu Q; Zhou H; Sheng X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():727893. PubMed ID: 34603151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: Examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework.
    Lin SH; Johnson RE
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 Sep; 100(5):1381-97. PubMed ID: 25706447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When prohibitive voice is effective? Exploring the jointly moderating role of hindrance stressor and work-based construal level.
    Chen L
    Heliyon; 2022 Oct; 8(10):e11116. PubMed ID: 36303909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of perceived organizational support on the prohibitive voice behavior of knowledgeable talents during the COVID-19 pandemic: Exploring moderating role of the digitalization level.
    Chen X; Ren K; Shen Y
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1020263. PubMed ID: 36507046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Employee voice behavior as a critical factor for organizational sustainability in the telecommunications industry.
    Um-E-Rubbab ; Naqvi SMMR
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238451. PubMed ID: 32881917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Performance Implication of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Role of Employee's Prosocial Motivation.
    Kim MJ; Kim BJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(6):. PubMed ID: 33803584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonlinear consequences of promotive and prohibitive voice for managers' responses: The roles of voice frequency and LMX.
    Huang X; Xu E; Huang L; Liu W
    J Appl Psychol; 2018 Oct; 103(10):1101-1120. PubMed ID: 29939035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.