These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33324705)

  • 1. Tilapia On-Farm Welfare Assessment Protocol for Semi-intensive Production Systems.
    Pedrazzani AS; Quintiliano MH; Bolfe F; Sans ECO; Molento CFM
    Front Vet Sci; 2020; 7():606388. PubMed ID: 33324705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Invited review: Animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment for dairy goats.
    Battini M; Vieira A; Barbieri S; Ajuda I; Stilwell G; Mattiello S
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Nov; 97(11):6625-48. PubMed ID: 25242423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of herd size on the welfare of dairy cows in a pasture-based system using animal- and resource-based indicators.
    Beggs DS; Jongman EC; Hemsworth PH; Fisher AD
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3406-3420. PubMed ID: 30738685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of carcass lesions as indicators for on-farm health and welfare of pigs.
    van Staaveren N; Doyle B; Manzanilla EG; Calderón Díaz JA; Hanlon A; Boyle LA
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1528-1536. PubMed ID: 28464078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simplifying the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for broiler chicken welfare.
    de Jong IC; Hindle VA; Butterworth A; Engel B; Ferrari P; Gunnink H; Perez Moya T; Tuyttens FA; van Reenen CG
    Animal; 2016 Jan; 10(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 26306882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Welfare in Nile Tilapia Production: Dorsal Fin Erection as a Visual Indicator for Insensibility.
    Camargo-Dos-Santos B; Carlos CL; Favero-Neto J; Alves NPC; Gonçalves BB; Giaquinto PC
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34680026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest reliability of the Welfare Quality Assessment protocol for pigs applied to sows and piglets. Part 2. Assessment of the principles good feeding, good housing, and good health1.
    Friedrich L; Krieter J; Kemper N; Czycholl I
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 97(3):1143-1157. PubMed ID: 30668710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Associations between carcass weight uniformity and production measures on farm and at slaughter in commercial broiler flocks.
    Vasdal G; Granquist EG; Skjerve E; de Jong IC; Berg C; Michel V; Moe RO
    Poult Sci; 2019 Oct; 98(10):4261-4268. PubMed ID: 31134272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of pig welfare assessment protocol integrating animal-, environment-, and management-based measures.
    Renggaman A; Choi HL; Sudiarto SIa; Alasaarela L; Nam OS
    J Anim Sci Technol; 2015; 57():1. PubMed ID: 26290721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consistency over time of animal-based welfare indicators as a further step for developing a welfare assessment monitoring scheme: The case of the Animal Welfare Indicators protocol for dairy goats.
    Can E; Vieira A; Battini M; Mattiello S; Stilwell G
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9194-9204. PubMed ID: 28865860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Assessment of Housing Conditions, Management, Animal-Based Measure of Dairy Goats’ Welfare and Its Association with Productive and Reproductive Traits.
    Tiezzi F; Tomassone L; Mancin G; Cornale P; Tarantola M
    Animals (Basel); 2019 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 31683827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is humane slaughtering of rainbow trout achieved in conventional production chains in Germany? Results of a pilot field and laboratory study.
    Jung-Schroers V; Hildebrandt U; Retter K; Esser KH; Hellmann J; Kleingeld DW; Rohn K; Steinhagen D
    BMC Vet Res; 2020 Jun; 16(1):197. PubMed ID: 32539725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On-farm broiler chicken welfare assessment using transect sampling reflects environmental inputs and production outcomes.
    BenSassi N; Vas J; Vasdal G; Averós X; Estévez I; Newberry RC
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214070. PubMed ID: 30995219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The First Protocol for Assessing Welfare of Camels.
    Padalino B; Menchetti L
    Front Vet Sci; 2020; 7():631876. PubMed ID: 33585612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Welfare Indicators in Tilapia: An Epidemiological Approach.
    Flores-García L; Camargo-Castellanos JC; Pascual-Jímenez C; Almazán-Rueda P; Monroy-López JF; Albertos-Alpuche PJ; Martínez-Yáñez R
    Front Vet Sci; 2022; 9():882567. PubMed ID: 35832331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Animal welfare in the U.S. slaughter industry-a focus on fed cattle.
    Edwards-Callaway LN; Calvo-Lorenzo MS
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 98(4):. PubMed ID: 32026929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Associations between Pre-Slaughter and Post-Slaughter Indicators of Animal Welfare in Cull Cows.
    Sánchez-Hidalgo M; Rosenfeld C; Gallo C
    Animals (Basel); 2019 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 31480736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing Extensive Semi-Arid Rangeland Beef Cow-Calf Welfare in Namibia: Part 1: Comparison Between Farm Production System's Effect on the Welfare of Beef Cows.
    Kaurivi YB; Laven R; Parkinson T; Hickson R; Stafford K
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 33445688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Welfare effects of a disease eradication programme for dairy goats.
    Muri K; Leine N; Valle PS
    Animal; 2016 Feb; 10(2):333-41. PubMed ID: 25990702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Broiler chickens dead on arrival: associated risk factors and welfare indicators.
    Jacobs L; Delezie E; Duchateau L; Goethals K; Tuyttens FA
    Poult Sci; 2017 Feb; 96(2):259-265. PubMed ID: 27702922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.