260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33325519)
1. Genetic parameters and purebred-crossbred genetic correlations for growth, meat quality, and carcass traits in pigs.
Esfandyari H; Thekkoot D; Kemp R; Plastow G; Dekkers J
J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33325519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic correlations between feed efficiency traits, and growth performance and carcass traits in purebred and crossbred pigs.
Godinho RM; Bergsma R; Silva FF; Sevillano CA; Knol EF; Lopes MS; Lopes PS; Bastiaansen JWM; Guimarães SEF
J Anim Sci; 2018 Apr; 96(3):817-829. PubMed ID: 29378008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Purebred-crossbred genetic parameters for reproductive traits in swine.
Kramer LM; Wolc A; Esfandyari H; Thekkoot DM; Zhang C; Kemp RA; Plastow G; Dekkers JCM
J Anim Sci; 2021 Oct; 99(10):. PubMed ID: 34558614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic correlations between growth performance and carcass traits of purebred and crossbred pigs raised in tropical and temperate climates1.
Godinho RM; Bergsma R; Silva FF; Sevillano CA; Knol EF; Komen H; Guimarães SEF; Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JWM
J Anim Sci; 2019 Sep; 97(9):3648-3657. PubMed ID: 31278865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genome-wide association study for carcass quality traits and growth in purebred and crossbred pigs1.
Bergamaschi M; Maltecca C; Fix J; Schwab C; Tiezzi F
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 98(1):. PubMed ID: 31768540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of inclusion rates of crossbred phenotypes and genotypes in nucleus selection programs.
See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33180915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imputation of non-genotyped F1 dams to improve genetic gain in swine crossbreeding programs.
See GM; Fix JS; Schwab CR; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2022 May; 100(5):. PubMed ID: 35451025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Leveraging low-density crossbred genotypes to offset crossbred phenotypes and their impact on purebred predictions.
Leite NG; Chen CY; Herring WO; Holl J; Tsuruta S; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36309902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for carcass and meat quality traits in commercial crossbred pigs.
Miar Y; Plastow GS; Moore SS; Manafiazar G; Charagu P; Kemp RA; Van Haandel B; Huisman AE; Zhang CY; McKay RM; Bruce HL; Wang Z
J Anim Sci; 2014 Jul; 92(7):2869-84. PubMed ID: 24778330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.
See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33560334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Review: optimizing genomic selection for crossbred performance by model improvement and data collection.
Duenk P; Bijma P; Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL
J Anim Sci; 2021 Aug; 99(8):. PubMed ID: 34223907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of genomic prediction using deregressed breeding values estimated from purebred and crossbred offspring phenotypes in pigs.
Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Veroneze R; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jul; 93(7):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26440000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic parameters of meat quality, carcass composition, and growth traits in commercial swine.
Khanal P; Maltecca C; Schwab C; Gray K; Tiezzi F
J Anim Sci; 2019 Sep; 97(9):3669-3683. PubMed ID: 31350997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic prediction in pigs using data from a commercial crossbred population: insights from the Duroc x (Landrace x Yorkshire) three-way crossbreeding system.
Liu S; Yao T; Chen D; Xiao S; Chen L; Zhang Z
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Mar; 55(1):21. PubMed ID: 36977978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of conventional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP evaluations for yearling weight and carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using single trait and multi-trait models.
Mehrban H; Lee DH; Naserkheil M; Moradi MH; Ibáñez-Escriche N
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223352. PubMed ID: 31609979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between performance traits with meat quality and carcass characteristics in commercial crossbred pigs.
Miar Y; Plastow G; Bruce H; Moore S; Manafiazar G; Kemp R; Charagu P; Huisman A; van Haandel B; Zhang C; McKay R; Wang Z
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110105. PubMed ID: 25350845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation of body weight in broiler chickens with pedigree or genomic relationships.
Duenk P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Breen VP; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Bijma P
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Feb; 51(1):6. PubMed ID: 30782121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic analysis of egg production traits in turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) using a single-step genomic random regression model.
Emamgholi Begli H; Schaeffer LR; Abdalla E; Lozada-Soto EA; Harlander-Matauschek A; Wood BJ; Baes CF
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Jul; 53(1):61. PubMed ID: 34284722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pedigree and genomic evaluation of pigs using a terminal-cross model.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Riquet J; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Apr; 48():32. PubMed ID: 27056443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
