260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33325519)
21. Design of reference populations for genomic selection in crossbreeding programs.
van Grevenhof IE; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):14. PubMed ID: 25887562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle.
Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Mehrban H
BMC Genet; 2020 Dec; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33267771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bias in variance component estimation in swine crossbreeding schemes using selective genotyping and phenotyping strategies.
See GM; Mote BE; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2021 Nov; 99(11):. PubMed ID: 34661671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Single-Step Genomic Evaluation for Meat Quality Traits, Sensory Characteristics, and Fatty-Acid Composition in Duroc Pigs.
Lopez BI; Santiago KG; Lee D; Cho Y; Lim D; Seo K
Genes (Basel); 2020 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 32916909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor to enhance the mitigation of seasonal losses due to heat stress in pigs.
Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Bradford HL; Gray KA; Huang Y; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2016 Dec; 94(12):5004-5013. PubMed ID: 28046178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Including crossbred pigs in the genomic relationship matrix through utilization of both linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis.
Iversen MW; Nordbø Ø; Gjerlaug-Enger E; Grindflek E; Lopes MS; Meuwissen THE
J Anim Sci; 2017 Dec; 95(12):5197-5207. PubMed ID: 29293760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genetic parameters for carcass composition and pork quality estimated in a commercial production chain.
van Wijk HJ; Arts DJ; Matthews JO; Webster M; Ducro BJ; Knol EF
J Anim Sci; 2005 Feb; 83(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 15644503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.
Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34390341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. BOARD INVITED REVIEW: The purebred-crossbred correlation in pigs: A review of theory, estimates, and implications.
Wientjes YCJ; Calus MPL
J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3467-3478. PubMed ID: 28805893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Genomic prediction for crossbred performance using metafounders.
van Grevenhof EM; Vandenplas J; Calus MPL
J Anim Sci; 2019 Feb; 97(2):548-558. PubMed ID: 30423111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of Genome-Enabled Prediction for Carcass Primal Cut Yields Using Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction in Hanwoo Cattle.
Naserkheil M; Mehrban H; Lee D; Park MN
Genes (Basel); 2021 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 34946834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Temporal dynamics of genetic parameters and SNP effects for performance and disorder traits in poultry undergoing genomic selection.
Richter J; Hidalgo J; Bussiman F; Breen V; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38576313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Animal board invited review: The purebred-crossbred genetic correlation in poultry.
Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Bos J; Duenk P
Animal; 2023 Nov; 17(11):100997. PubMed ID: 37820407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of genomic preselection on subsequent ssGBLUP evaluation of preselected animals for scarcely recorded feed intake in pigs.
Jibrila I; Ten Napel J; Vandenplas J; Bergsma R; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 May; 140(3):253-263. PubMed ID: 36637041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Genome-wide mapping and identification of new quantitative trait loci affecting meat production, meat quality, and carcass traits within a Duroc purebred population.
Soma Y; Uemoto Y; Sato S; Shibata T; Kadowaki H; Kobayashi E; Suzuki K
J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):601-8. PubMed ID: 21097684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data1.
Pocrnic I; Lourenco DAL; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2019 Apr; 97(4):1513-1522. PubMed ID: 30726939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimal definition of contemporary groups for crossbred pigs in a joint purebred and crossbred genetic evaluation.
Steyn Y; Lourenco DA; Chen CY; Valente BD; Holl J; Herring WO; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2021 Jan; 99(1):. PubMed ID: 33313883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits.
Wei M; van der Werf JH
J Anim Sci; 1995 Aug; 73(8):2220-6. PubMed ID: 8567456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
