139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33325734)
1. Best Practices: Best Imaging Modality for Surveillance of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
Petscavage-Thomas JM; Ha A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Feb; 216(2):311-317. PubMed ID: 33325734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Is Ultrasound As Useful As Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Longitudinal Surveillance of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients?
Kwon YM; Dimitriou D; Liow MH; Tsai TY; Li G
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1821-7. PubMed ID: 26895821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PET/CT to detect adverse reactions to metal debris in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: an exploratory prospective study.
Aro E; Seppänen M; Mäkelä KT; Luoto P; Roivainen A; Aro HT
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Sep; 38(5):847-855. PubMed ID: 29280283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-sectional imaging of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. Can we substitute MARS MRI with CT?
Robinson E; Henckel J; Sabah S; Satchithananda K; Skinner J; Hart A
Acta Orthop; 2014 Dec; 85(6):577-84. PubMed ID: 25267500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adverse reaction to metal debris after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Junnila M; Seppänen M; Mokka J; Virolainen P; Pölönen T; Vahlberg T; Mattila K; Tuominen EK; Rantakokko J; Äärimaa V; Itälä A; Mäkelä KT
Acta Orthop; 2015 Jun; 86(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 25582189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in symptomatic versus asymptomatic subjects following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Nawabi DH; Hayter CL; Su EP; Koff MF; Perino G; Gold SL; Koch KM; Potter HG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 May; 95(10):895-902. PubMed ID: 23677356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI Findings in Patients After Small-Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-up of 10 Years.
Reiner T; Do TD; Klotz MC; Hertzsch F; Seelmann K; Gaida MM; Weber MA; Gotterbarm T
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 99(18):1540-1546. PubMed ID: 28926383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revision for adverse local tissue reaction following metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty is associated with a high risk of early major complications.
Waterson HB; Whitehouse MR; Greidanus NV; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jun; 100-B(6):720-724. PubMed ID: 29855241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What are the advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities to diagnose wear-related corrosion problems?
Nam D; Barrack RL; Potter HG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 472(12):3665-73. PubMed ID: 24664197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris.
Matharu GS; Eskelinen A; Judge A; Pandit HG; Murray DW
Acta Orthop; 2018 Jun; 89(3):278-288. PubMed ID: 29493348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adverse reaction to metal debris after small-head diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: an increasing concern.
D'Angelo F; Tanas D; Gallazzi E; Zagra L
Hip Int; 2018 Nov; 28(2_suppl):35-42. PubMed ID: 30755124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris From 28-mm Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasties With Minimum 10 Years of Follow-Up: Clinical, Laboratory, and Ultrasound Assessment of 44 Cases.
Ayoub B; Putman S; Cholewinski P; Paris A; Migaud H; Girard J
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1206-1210. PubMed ID: 27988181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Host-specific factors affect the pathogenesis of adverse reaction to metal debris.
Lehtovirta L; Reito A; Lainiala O; Parkkinen J; Hothi H; Henckel J; Hart A; Eskelinen A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):195. PubMed ID: 31054584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is ultrasound screening reliable for adverse local tissue reaction after hip arthroplasty?
Nishii T; Sakai T; Takao M; Yoshikawa H; Sugano N
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2239-44. PubMed ID: 24908625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of bearing wear, whole blood and synovial fluid metal ion concentrations and histopathological findings in patients with failed ASR hip resurfacings.
Lehtovirta L; Reito A; Parkkinen J; Hothi H; Henckel J; Hart A; Eskelinen A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Dec; 18(1):523. PubMed ID: 29228956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of adverse reaction to metallic debris following metal on metal hip replacement.
Singisetti K; Raju P; Nargol A
Acta Orthop Belg; 2019 Mar; 85(1):107-113. PubMed ID: 31023207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adverse Local Tissue Reaction After a Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Prosthesis Without Elevated Serum Metal Ion Levels.
Tetreault MW; Jacobs JJ; Mahmud W; Nam D
Orthopedics; 2018 May; 41(3):e438-e441. PubMed ID: 29257191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imaging of adverse reactions to metal debris.
Maloney E; Ha AS; Miller TT
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2015 Feb; 19(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 25633022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pleomorphic clinical spectrum of metallosis in total hip arthroplasty.
Pisanu F; Doria C; Andreozzi M; Bartoli M; Saderi L; Sotgiu G; Tranquilli Leali P
Int Orthop; 2019 Jan; 43(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 30269183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI findings, metal ion levels and clinical outcome of a complete series of large metal on metal THA: what's really going on?
Marchica D; Gallazzi E; Materazzi G; Battaglia GA; Zagra L
Hip Int; 2018 Nov; 28(2_suppl):48-53. PubMed ID: 30755111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
