These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33326566)

  • 21. Using a Patient Portal to Increase Enrollment in a Newborn Screening Research Study: Observational Study.
    Gehtland LM; Paquin RS; Andrews SM; Lee AM; Gwaltney A; Duparc M; Pfaff ER; Bailey DB
    JMIR Pediatr Parent; 2022 Feb; 5(1):e30941. PubMed ID: 35142618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the personalized invitation of Czech citizens to screening programs.
    Ngo O; Chloupková R; Ambrožová M; Suchánek Š; Zavoral M; Seifert B; Dvořák V; Daneš J; Skovajsová M; Dušek L; Májek O
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2019; 158(3-4):147-150. PubMed ID: 31416323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Individual invitation letters lead to significant increase in attendance for screening colonoscopies: Results of a pilot study in Northern Hesse, Germany.
    Stratmann K; Bock H; Filmann N; Fister P; Weber C; Tacke W; Simonis B; Höftmann M; Schröder O; Hausmann J; Zeuzem S; Blumenstein I
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2018 Aug; 6(7):1082-1088. PubMed ID: 30228897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Enhanced invitation methods and uptake of health checks in primary care: randomised controlled trial and cohort study using electronic health records.
    McDermott L; Wright AJ; Cornelius V; Burgess C; Forster AS; Ashworth M; Khoshaba B; Clery P; Fuller F; Miller J; Dodhia H; Rudisill C; Conner MT; Gulliford MC
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Nov; 20(84):1-92. PubMed ID: 27846927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of invitation schemes on breast cancer screening coverage: A cohort study from Copenhagen, Denmark.
    Jacobsen KK; von Euler Chelpin M; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    J Med Screen; 2017 Mar; 24(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27206815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving uptake in non-attenders of breast screening: selective use of second appointment.
    Stead MJ; Wallis MG; Wheaton ME
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 9718524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Invitation to cervical cancer screening does increase participation in Germany: Results from the MARZY study.
    Radde K; Gottschalk A; Bussas U; Schülein S; Schriefer D; Seifert U; Neumann A; Kaiser M; Blettner M; Klug SJ
    Int J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 139(5):1018-30. PubMed ID: 27083776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reinvitation to screening colonoscopy: a randomized-controlled trial of reminding letter and invitation to educational meeting on attendance in nonresponders to initial invitation to screening colonoscopy (REINVITE).
    Pisera M; Kaminski MF; Kraszewska E; Rupinski M; Regula J
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 May; 28(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 26967693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recruiting male partners for couple HIV testing and counselling in Malawi's option B+ programme: an unblinded randomised controlled trial.
    Rosenberg NE; Mtande TK; Saidi F; Stanley C; Jere E; Paile L; Kumwenda K; Mofolo I; Ng'ambi W; Miller WC; Hoffman I; Hosseinipour M
    Lancet HIV; 2015 Nov; 2(11):e483-91. PubMed ID: 26520928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Invitation cards during pregnancy enhance male partner involvement in prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in Blantyre, Malawi: a randomized controlled open label trial.
    Nyondo AL; Choko AT; Chimwaza AF; Muula AS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119273. PubMed ID: 25734485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Invitation to a population-based cohort study: differences between subjects recruited using various strategies.
    Manjer J; Elmståhl S; Janzon L; Berglund G
    Scand J Public Health; 2002; 30(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 12028859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inviting parents to take part in paediatric palliative care research: a mixed-methods examination of selection bias.
    Crocker JC; Beecham E; Kelly P; Dinsdale AP; Hemsley J; Jones L; Bluebond-Langner M
    Palliat Med; 2015 Mar; 29(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 25519146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening invitation letters.
    Decker KM; Turner D; Demers AA; Martens PJ; Lambert P; Chateau D
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2013 Aug; 22(8):687-93. PubMed ID: 23915107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of mailed invitation strategies to improve fecal occult blood test participation in men: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Duncan A; Zajac I; Flight I; Stewart BJ; Wilson C; Turnbull D
    Trials; 2013 Jul; 14():239. PubMed ID: 23902589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of prenatal micronutrient and early food supplementation on maternal hemoglobin, birth weight, and infant mortality among children in Bangladesh: the MINIMat randomized trial.
    Persson LÅ; Arifeen S; Ekström EC; Rasmussen KM; Frongillo EA; Yunus M;
    JAMA; 2012 May; 307(19):2050-9. PubMed ID: 22665104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using web-based and paper-based questionnaires for collecting data on fertility issues among female childhood cancer survivors: differences in response characteristics.
    van den Berg MH; Overbeek A; van der Pal HJ; Versluys AB; Bresters D; van Leeuwen FE; Lambalk CB; Kaspers GJ; van Dulmen-den Broeder E
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):e76. PubMed ID: 21955527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trial.
    Marteau TM; Mann E; Prevost AT; Vasconcelos JC; Kellar I; Sanderson S; Parker M; Griffin S; Sutton S; Kinmonth AL
    BMJ; 2010 May; 340():c2138. PubMed ID: 20466791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recruitment to mammography screening: a randomised trial and meta-analysis of invitation letters and telephone calls.
    Page A; Morrell S; Chiu C; Taylor R; Tewson R
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2006 Apr; 30(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 16681329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.