These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3332658)

  • 1. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of tumour invasion in vivo and in vitro.
    Mareel MM; Van Roy FM; Messiaen LM; Boghaert ER; Bruyneel EA
    J Cell Sci Suppl; 1987; 8():141-63. PubMed ID: 3332658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative evaluation of melanoma cell invasion in three-dimensional confrontation cultures in vitro using automated image analysis.
    Smolle J; Helige C; Soyer HP; Hoedl S; Popper H; Stettner H; Kerl H; Tritthart HA; Kresbach H
    J Invest Dermatol; 1990 Jan; 94(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 2404070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chick Heart Invasion Assay for Testing the Invasiveness of Cancer Cells and the Activity of Potentially Anti-invasive Compounds.
    Bracke ME; Roman BI; Stevens CV; Mus LM; Parmar VS; De Wever O; Mareel MM
    J Vis Exp; 2015 Jun; (100):e52792. PubMed ID: 26131648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An image analysis and statistical evaluation program for the assessment of tumour cell invasion in vitro.
    Smolle J; Helige C; Tritthart HA
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1992 Jan; 4(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 1734942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Invasiveness invitro versus clinical evolution of primary and secondary brain-tumors.
    Deridder L; Calliauw L
    Int J Oncol; 1993 Jan; 2(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 21573519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The invasiveness in vitro of brain tumour derived-cells depends on their micro-eco system.
    de Ridder L; Bruyneel E; Calliauw L
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1994; 130(1-4):140-3. PubMed ID: 7725937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An image analysis system for the quantification of invasion in vitro.
    de Neve WJ; Storme GA; de Bruyne GK; Mareel MM
    Clin Exp Metastasis; 1985; 3(2):87-101. PubMed ID: 4042464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cell movement and the mechanism of invasiveness: a survey of the behaviour of some normal and malignant cells implanted into the developing chick wing bud.
    Tickle C; Crawley A; Goodman M
    J Cell Sci; 1978 Jun; 31():293-322. PubMed ID: 670325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Malignancy of neurogenic cells characterized by their invasiveness in vitro.
    De Ridder L; Laerum O
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1981; 51(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 7259438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Invasion of malignant cells in vivo and in vitro: similarities and differences.
    Mareel MK; Meyvisch C
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1981; 51(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 7196211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo and in vitro invasion in relation to phenotypic characteristics of human colorectal carcinoma cells.
    de Vries JE; Dinjens WN; De Bruyne GK; Verspaget HW; van der Linden EP; de Bruïne AP; Mareel MM; Bosman FT; ten Kate J
    Br J Cancer; 1995 Feb; 71(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 7841040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Invasive pattern and phenotypic properties of malignant neurogenic rats cells in vivo and in vitro.
    Mørk S; De Ridder L; Laerum OD
    Anticancer Res; 1982; 2(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 7114799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods of study of the invasion of malignant C3H-mouse fibroblasts into embryonic chick heart in vitro.
    Mareel M; Kint J; Meyvisch C
    Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol; 1979 May; 30(1):95-111. PubMed ID: 37648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation of melanoma cell motility and invasion in vitro.
    Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Fink-Puches R; Smolle J; Helige C; Tritthart HA; Kerl H
    Melanoma Res; 1995 Oct; 5(5):311-9. PubMed ID: 8541721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Improved
    Mangir N; Raza A; Haycock JW; Chapple C; Macneil S
    In Vivo; 2018; 32(3):461-472. PubMed ID: 29695547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro assay of the invasive potential of malignant bone and soft tissue tumours through basement membranes.
    Iwamoto Y; Tanaka K; Okuyama K; Sugioka Y; Taniguchi S
    Int Orthop; 1994; 18(4):240-7. PubMed ID: 8002114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Carcinoma of the penis--appraisal of a modified tumour-staging system.
    Heyns CF; van Vollenhoven P; Steenkamp JW; Allen FJ; van Velden DJ
    Br J Urol; 1997 Aug; 80(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 9284207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of anticancer agents on invasion of mouse fibrosarcoma cells in vitro.
    Storme G; Mareel MM
    Oncology; 1981; 38(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 7207954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional reconstruction and quantification of cervical carcinoma invasion fronts from histological serial sections.
    Braumann UD; Kuska JP; Einenkel J; Horn LC; Löffler M; Höckel M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1286-307. PubMed ID: 16229416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Organ specific regulation of tumour invasiveness and gelatinolytic activity at the invasive front.
    Hadler-Olsen E; Wetting HL; Ravuri C; Omair A; Rikardsen O; Svineng G; Kanapathippillai P; Winberg JO; Uhlin-Hansen L
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jan; 47(2):305-15. PubMed ID: 20932741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.