181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33327884)
21. Impact of immobilization on intrafraction motion for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy using cone beam computed tomography.
Li W; Sahgal A; Foote M; Millar BA; Jaffray DA; Letourneau D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Oct; 84(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 22401920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Estimating PTV Margins in Head and Neck Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy (SABR) Through Target Site Analysis of Positioning and Intrafractional Accuracy.
Mesko S; Wang H; Tung S; Wang C; Pasalic D; Chapman BV; Moreno AC; Reddy JP; Garden AS; Rosenthal DI; Gunn GB; Frank SJ; Fuller CD; Morrison W; Phan J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Jan; 106(1):185-193. PubMed ID: 31580928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of initial setup accuracy and intrafraction motion for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy using stereotactic body frames.
Han Z; Bondeson JC; Lewis JH; Mannarino EG; Friesen SA; Wagar MM; Balboni TA; Alexander BM; Arvold ND; Sher DJ; Hacker FL
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2016; 6(1):e17-24. PubMed ID: 26603596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?
Luo J; Yin Z; Zhang Z; Guo X; Yu X; Wang J
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Aug; 16(1):143. PubMed ID: 34344403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detection of setup errors with a body-surface laser-scanning system for whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery.
Jiang P; Liu Z; Jiang W; Qu A; Sun H; Wang J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 May; 23(5):e13578. PubMed ID: 35293667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of use of optical surface imaging on initial patient setup for stereotactic body radiotherapy treatments.
Leong B; Padilla L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):149-158. PubMed ID: 31833639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Superiority of a soft tissue-based setup using cone-beam computed tomography over a bony structure-based setup in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Sato H; Abe E; Utsunomiya S; Kaidu M; Yamana N; Tanaka K; Ohta A; Obinata M; Liu J; Kawaguchi G; Maruyama K; Ayukawa F; Aoyama H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):239–245. PubMed ID: 26699304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of body-mass factors on setup displacement in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy using daily on-line image guidance.
Lai YL; Yang SN; Liang JA; Wang YC; Yu CY; Su CH; Chen SW
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 9():19. PubMed ID: 24411006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Set-up errors and planning margins in planar and CBCT image-guided radiotherapy using three different imaging systems: A clinical study for prostate and head-and-neck cancer.
Dzierma Y; Beyhs M; Palm J; Niewald M; Bell K; Nuesken F; Licht N; Rübe C
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1055-1059. PubMed ID: 26476789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Uncertainty in the positioning of patients receiving treatment for brain metastases and wearing surgical mask underneath thermoplastic mask during COVID-19 crisis.
Miura H; Hioki K; Ozawa S; Kanemoto K; Nakao M; Doi Y; Kenjo M; Nagata Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 22(6):274-280. PubMed ID: 34028970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Setup uncertainties of anatomical sub-regions in head-and-neck cancer patients after offline CBCT guidance.
van Kranen S; van Beek S; Rasch C; van Herk M; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1566-73. PubMed ID: 19306753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Development of twist-correction system for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer patients.
Shimizu H; Sasaki K; Aoyama T; Matsushima S; Isomura T; Fukuma H; Tachibana H; Kodaira T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):128-134. PubMed ID: 31222881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The residual setup errors of different IGRT alignment procedures for head and neck IMRT and the resulting dosimetric impact.
Graff P; Kirby N; Weinberg V; Chen J; Yom SS; Lambert L; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 May; 86(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 23245281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Correction of patient positioning errors based on in-line cone beam CTs: clinical implementation and first experiences.
Thilmann C; Nill S; Tücking T; Höss A; Hesse B; Dietrich L; Bendl R; Rhein B; Häring P; Thieke C; Oelfke U; Debus J; Huber P
Radiat Oncol; 2006 May; 1():16. PubMed ID: 16723023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Verification of planning target volume settings in volumetric modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiation therapy by using in-treatment 4-dimensional cone beam computed tomography.
Takahashi W; Yamashita H; Kida S; Masutani Y; Sakumi A; Ohtomo K; Nakagawa K; Haga A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jul; 86(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 23562767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole-breast cancer radiotherapy.
Hattel SH; Andersen PA; Wahlstedt IH; Damkjaer S; Saini A; Thomsen JB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):39-44. PubMed ID: 31187538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy to the Mediastinum for Lymphoma Patients: Setup Uncertainties and Margins.
Aristophanous M; Chi PM; Kao J; Williamson R; Tung S; Andraos T; Milgrom SA; Pinnix CC; Dabaja BS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jan; 100(1):254-262. PubMed ID: 29100788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Positioning reproducibility with and without rotational corrections for 2 head and neck immobilization systems.
Courneyea L; Mullins J; Howard M; Foote R; Garces Y; Ma D; Beltran C; Brinkmann D; Pafundi D
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(6):e575-81. PubMed ID: 26169225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical utility of a new immobilization method in image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for breast cancer patients after radical mastectomy.
Dong F; Weng X; Deng X; Yang Y; Xu B; Li X
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(4):641-655. PubMed ID: 35367978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Set-up errors in head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy: Quantitative comparison between three-dimensional cone-beam CT and two-dimensional kilovoltage images.
Ciardo D; Alterio D; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Riboldi M; Zerini D; Santoro L; Preve E; Rondi E; Comi S; Serafini F; Laudati A; Ansarin M; Preda L; Baroni G; Orecchia R
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 26459318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
