348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33327963)
1. Mixed reality for teaching catheter placement to medical students: a randomized single-blinded, prospective trial.
Schoeb DS; Schwarz J; Hein S; Schlager D; Pohlmann PF; Frankenschmidt A; Gratzke C; Miernik A
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Dec; 20(1):510. PubMed ID: 33327963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Artificial Intelligence Tutoring vs Expert Instruction on Learning Simulated Surgical Skills Among Medical Students: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Fazlollahi AM; Bakhaidar M; Alsayegh A; Yilmaz R; Winkler-Schwartz A; Mirchi N; Langleben I; Ledwos N; Sabbagh AJ; Bajunaid K; Harley JM; Del Maestro RF
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Feb; 5(2):e2149008. PubMed ID: 35191972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the effectiveness of augmented reality-based and conventional instructions during single ECMO cannulation training.
Wolf J; Wolfer V; Halbe M; Maisano F; Lohmeyer Q; Meboldt M
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2021 Jul; 16(7):1171-1180. PubMed ID: 34023976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Delivering clinical tutorials to medical students using the Microsoft HoloLens 2: A mixed-methods evaluation.
Connolly M; Iohom G; O'Brien N; Volz J; O'Muircheartaigh A; Serchan P; Biculescu A; Gadre KG; Soare C; Griseto L; Shorten G
BMC Med Educ; 2024 May; 24(1):498. PubMed ID: 38704522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intravenous catheter training system: computer-based education versus traditional learning methods.
Engum SA; Jeffries P; Fisher L
Am J Surg; 2003 Jul; 186(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 12842753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of mixed reality technology for the objective assessment of clinical skills: a validation study.
Minty I; Lawson J; Guha P; Luo X; Malik R; Cerneviciute R; Kinross J; Martin G
BMC Med Educ; 2022 Aug; 22(1):639. PubMed ID: 35999532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of App-Based Serious Gaming as a Training Method in Teaching Chest Tube Insertion to Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Haubruck P; Nickel F; Ober J; Walker T; Bergdolt C; Friedrich M; Müller-Stich BP; Forchheim F; Fischer C; Schmidmaier G; Tanner MC
J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e195. PubMed ID: 29784634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual reality in nursing education 3D intravenous catheterization E-learning: A randomized controlled trial.
Yildiz H; Demiray A
Contemp Nurse; 2022; 58(2-3):125-137. PubMed ID: 35262461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peripheral venous catheter insertion simulation training: A randomized controlled trial comparing performance after instructor-led teaching versus peer-assisted learning.
Pelloux S; Grégoire A; Kirmizigul P; Maillot S; Bui-Xuan B; Llorca G; Boet S; Lehot JJ; Rimmelé T
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2017 Dec; 36(6):397-402. PubMed ID: 28109939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Teaching ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter placement through immersive virtual reality: An explorative pilot study.
Andersen NL; Jensen RO; Posth S; Laursen CB; Jørgensen R; Graumann O
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jul; 100(27):e26394. PubMed ID: 34232171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Refreshing medical students' intravenous-cannulation skills: a blinded observer three-arm randomised comparison of mental imagery, part-task trainer simulation and written instructions.
Berger-Estilita J; Blülle R; Stricker D; Balmer M; Greif R; Berendonk C
BMJ Open; 2022 Jun; 12(6):e057201. PubMed ID: 36691242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relevance of low-fidelity virtual reality simulators compared with other learning methods in basic endovascular skills training.
Aeckersberg G; Gkremoutis A; Schmitz-Rixen T; Kaiser E
J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jan; 69(1):227-235. PubMed ID: 30579447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can an Augmented Reality Headset Improve Accuracy of Acetabular Cup Orientation in Simulated THA? A Randomized Trial.
Logishetty K; Western L; Morgan R; Iranpour F; Cobb JP; Auvinet E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 May; 477(5):1190-1199. PubMed ID: 30507832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Ultrasound Education for Medical Students: Virtual Reality Versus e-Learning, a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.
Rosenfeldt Nielsen M; Kristensen EQ; Jensen RO; Mollerup AM; Pfeiffer T; Graumann O
Ultrasound Q; 2021 Sep; 37(3):292-296. PubMed ID: 34478430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Virtual Reality Compared with Bench-Top Simulation in the Acquisition of Arthroscopic Skill: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Banaszek D; You D; Chang J; Pickell M; Hesse D; Hopman WM; Borschneck D; Bardana D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Apr; 99(7):e34. PubMed ID: 28375898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Teaching with Disruptive Technology: The Use of Augmented, Virtual, and Mixed Reality (HoloLens) for Disease Education.
Stromberga Z; Phelps C; Smith J; Moro C
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2021; 1317():147-162. PubMed ID: 33945136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Student perceptions toward virtual reality training in dental implant education.
Huang Y; Hu Y; Chan U; Lai P; Sun Y; Dai J; Cheng X; Yang X
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14857. PubMed ID: 37168535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-assisted teaching of epistaxis management: a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Glicksman JT; Brandt MG; Moukarbel RV; Rotenberg B; Fung K
Laryngoscope; 2009 Mar; 119(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 19235749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-directed learning digital tool versus tutorials under the guidance of an educator: Randomized trial.
Khalfallah M; Dougaz W; Jerraya H; Samaali I; Mazigh S; Loueslati MH; Nouira R; Bou Asker I; Dziri C
Tunis Med; 2019 Feb; 97(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 31539086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
