BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1075 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33328045)

  • 1. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
    Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
    Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
    Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
    Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
    Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Use of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Pathologist Assessment to Review and Grade Prostate Biopsies.
    Steiner DF; Nagpal K; Sayres R; Foote DJ; Wedin BD; Pearce A; Cai CJ; Winter SR; Symonds M; Yatziv L; Kapishnikov A; Brown T; Flament-Auvigne I; Tan F; Stumpe MC; Jiang PP; Liu Y; Chen PC; Corrado GS; Terry M; Mermel CH
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2023267. PubMed ID: 33180129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and validation of artificial intelligence-based prescreening of large-bowel biopsies taken in the UK and Portugal: a retrospective cohort study.
    Bilal M; Tsang YW; Ali M; Graham S; Hero E; Wahab N; Dodd K; Sahota H; Wu S; Lu W; Jahanifar M; Robinson A; Azam A; Benes K; Nimir M; Hewitt K; Bhalerao A; Eldaly H; Raza SEA; Gopalakrishnan K; Minhas F; Snead D; Rajpoot N
    Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Nov; 5(11):e786-e797. PubMed ID: 37890902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study.
    Jung M; Jin MS; Kim C; Lee C; Nikas IP; Park JH; Ryu HS
    Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 35487950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
    Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies.
    Raciti P; Sue J; Ceballos R; Godrich R; Kunz JD; Kapur S; Reuter V; Grady L; Kanan C; Klimstra DS; Fuchs TJ
    Mod Pathol; 2020 Oct; 33(10):2058-2066. PubMed ID: 32393768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of Deep Learning to Develop and Analyze Computational Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining of Prostate Core Biopsy Images for Tumor Diagnosis.
    Rana A; Lowe A; Lithgow M; Horback K; Janovitz T; Da Silva A; Tsai H; Shanmugam V; Bayat A; Shah P
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e205111. PubMed ID: 32432709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Artificial intelligence-based model for lymph node metastases detection on whole slide images in bladder cancer: a retrospective, multicentre, diagnostic study.
    Wu S; Hong G; Xu A; Zeng H; Chen X; Wang Y; Luo Y; Wu P; Liu C; Jiang N; Dang Q; Yang C; Liu B; Shen R; Chen Z; Liao C; Lin Z; Wang J; Lin T
    Lancet Oncol; 2023 Apr; 24(4):360-370. PubMed ID: 36893772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An independent assessment of an artificial intelligence system for prostate cancer detection shows strong diagnostic accuracy.
    Perincheri S; Levi AW; Celli R; Gershkovich P; Rimm D; Morrow JS; Rothrock B; Raciti P; Klimstra D; Sinard J
    Mod Pathol; 2021 Aug; 34(8):1588-1595. PubMed ID: 33782551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial intelligence-assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies.
    Eloy C; Marques A; Pinto J; Pinheiro J; Campelos S; Curado M; Vale J; Polónia A
    Virchows Arch; 2023 Mar; 482(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 36809483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An artificial intelligence model for detecting pathological lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer using whole slide images: a retrospective, multicentre, diagnostic study.
    Wu S; Wang Y; Hong G; Luo Y; Lin Z; Shen R; Zeng H; Xu A; Wu P; Xiao M; Li X; Rao P; Yang Q; Feng Z; He Q; Jiang F; Xie Y; Liao C; Huang X; Chen R; Lin T
    EClinicalMedicine; 2024 May; 71():102580. PubMed ID: 38618206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in digital and routine microscopic assessment of prostate needle biopsies.
    Rodriguez-Urrego PA; Cronin AM; Al-Ahmadie HA; Gopalan A; Tickoo SK; Reuter VE; Fine SW
    Hum Pathol; 2011 Jan; 42(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 20970164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Chest Radiograph Interpretations by Artificial Intelligence Algorithm vs Radiology Residents.
    Wu JT; Wong KCL; Gur Y; Ansari N; Karargyris A; Sharma A; Morris M; Saboury B; Ahmad H; Boyko O; Syed A; Jadhav A; Wang H; Pillai A; Kashyap S; Moradi M; Syeda-Mahmood T
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Oct; 3(10):e2022779. PubMed ID: 33034642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. iPathology cockpit diagnostic station: validation according to College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center recommendation at the Hospital Trust and University of Verona.
    Brunelli M; Beccari S; Colombari R; Gobbo S; Giobelli L; Pellegrini A; Chilosi M; Lunardi M; Martignoni G; Scarpa A; Eccher A
    Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 25565219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of Whole Slide Imaging for primary surgical pathology diagnosis of prostate biopsies.
    Rao V; Subramanian P; Sali AP; Menon S; Desai SB
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2021; 64(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 33433413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artificial intelligence for advance requesting of immunohistochemistry in diagnostically uncertain prostate biopsies.
    Chatrian A; Colling RT; Browning L; Alham NK; Sirinukunwattana K; Malacrino S; Haghighat M; Aberdeen A; Monks A; Moxley-Wyles B; Rakha E; Snead DRJ; Rittscher J; Verrill C
    Mod Pathol; 2021 Sep; 34(9):1780-1794. PubMed ID: 34017063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 54.