These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3332828)
1. Procreative liberty, embryos, and collaborative reproduction: a legal perspective. Robertson JA Women Health; 1987; 13(1-2):179-94. PubMed ID: 3332828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Procreative liberty and the state's burden of proof in regulating noncoital reproduction. Robertson JA Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):18-26. PubMed ID: 3060682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The argument for unlimited procreative liberty: a feminist critique. Ryan MA Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):6-12. PubMed ID: 2211090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Social policy considerations in noncoital reproduction. Elias S; Annas GJ JAMA; 1986 Jan; 255(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 3940307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Providing protection for collaborative noncoital reproduction: surrogate motherhood and other new procreative technologies, and the right of intimate association. Ikemoto LC Rutgers Law Rev; 1988; 40(4):1273-309. PubMed ID: 11650138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The technology, law, and ethics of in vitro fertilization, gamete donation, and surrogate motherhood. Wasserman D; Wachbroit R Clin Lab Med; 1992 Sep; 12(3):429-48. PubMed ID: 1521422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Embryos, families, and procreative liberty: the legal structure of the new reproduction. Robertson JA South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):939-1041. PubMed ID: 11655852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Human embryo experimentation: regulation and relative rights. Feiler CL Fordham Law Rev; 1998 May; 66(6):2435-69. PubMed ID: 10342917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Frozen embryos: moral, social, and legal implications. Wurmbrand MJ South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1079-100. PubMed ID: 11655851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive rights and responsibilities. Steinbock B Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 8088995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive technology for procreation, experimentation, and profit. Protecting rights and setting limits. Garcia SA J Leg Med; 1990 Mar; 11(1):1-57. PubMed ID: 2277231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Procreative liberty in the era of genomics. Robertson JA Am J Law Med; 2003; 29(4):439-87. PubMed ID: 15119245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Against procreative moral rights. Earl J Bioethics; 2022 Jun; 36(5):569-575. PubMed ID: 34908181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Infertility and bioethical issues of the new reproductive technologies. Herz EK Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1989 Mar; 12(1):117-31. PubMed ID: 2652103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical issues in selecting embryos. Rhodes R Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2001 Sep; 943():360-7. PubMed ID: 11594556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The new reproductive technologies and the law: a Roman Catholic perspective. Wagner WJ J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():37-70. PubMed ID: 11645612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The case for regulating collaborative reproduction: a children's rights perspective. Alvare HM Harvard J Legis; 2003; 40(1):1-63. PubMed ID: 15212033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Liberty and assisted reproduction. Robertson JA Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):48-53. PubMed ID: 11654494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproductive Rights without Resources or Recourse. Mutcherson K Hastings Cent Rep; 2017 Dec; 47 Suppl 3():S12-S18. PubMed ID: 29171886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges. Capron AM Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]