These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33329120)

  • 1. Criminal Responsibility Scale: Development and Validation of a Psychometric Tool Structured in Clinical Vignettes for Criminal Responsibility Assessments in Brazil.
    Meyer LF; Leal CCS; Omena AAS; Mecler K; Valença AM
    Front Psychiatry; 2020; 11():579243. PubMed ID: 33329120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors related to bias in forensic psychiatric assessments in criminal matters: A systematic review.
    Meyer LF; Valença AM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 75():101681. PubMed ID: 33712325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The reliability and validity of the rating scale of criminal responsibility for mentally disordered offenders.
    Cai W; Zhang Q; Huang F; Guan W; Tang T; Liu C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Mar; 236():146-50. PubMed ID: 24529786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive Validity of Operationalized Criteria for the Assessment of Criminal Responsibility of Sexual Offenders With Paraphilic Disorders-A Randomized Control Trial With Mental Health and Legal Professionals.
    Dobbrunz S; Daubmann A; Müller JL; Briken P
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():613081. PubMed ID: 33391132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forensic psychiatry in Kuwait - characterization of forensic psychiatry patients evaluated over year duration in the only available forensic psychiatry unit.
    Alhumoud A; Zahid M; Ibrahim S; Syed T; Naguy A
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 60():12-16. PubMed ID: 30217325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of assessment instruments in forensic evaluations of criminal responsibility in Norway.
    Løvgren PJ; Laake P; Reitan SK; Narud K
    BMC Psychiatry; 2022 Apr; 22(1):235. PubMed ID: 35365096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of a new instrument to guide and support insanity evaluations: the defendant's insanity assessment support scale (DIASS).
    Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Roma P; Ferracuti S
    Transl Psychiatry; 2022 Mar; 12(1):115. PubMed ID: 35318308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of repeated forensic evaluations of legal sanity.
    Kacperska I; Heitzman J; Bąk T; Leśko AW; Opio M
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 44():24-9. PubMed ID: 26346685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neuroscience in forensic psychiatry: From responsibility to dangerousness. Ethical and legal implications of using neuroscience for dangerousness assessments.
    Gkotsi GM; Gasser J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 46():58-67. PubMed ID: 27209602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The factors associated with forensic psychiatrists' decisions in criminal responsibility and social dangerousness evaluations.
    Mandarelli G; Carabellese F; Felthous AR; Parmigiani G; Del Casale A; Catanesi R; Montalbò D; Ferracuti S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101503. PubMed ID: 31706410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A forensic-psychiatric study of sexual offenders in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    Valença AM; Meyer LF; Freire R; Mendlowicz MV; Nardi AE
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2015 Apr; 31():23-8. PubMed ID: 25735780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review of psychiatric services to mentally disordered offenders around the Pacific Rim.
    Every-Palmer S; Brink J; Chern TP; Choi WK; Hern-Yee JG; Green B; Heffernan E; Johnson SB; Kachaeva M; Shiina A; Walker D; Wu K; Wang X; Mellsop G
    Asia Pac Psychiatry; 2014 Mar; 6(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 24249353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The application of diminished criminal responsibility rating scale to schizophrenia offenders].
    Huang FY; Cai WX; Zhang QT; Tang T; Wu JS; Wang JJ
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 22(4):288-90. PubMed ID: 17080670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
    Cobun LS
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal insanity and risk: An international perspective on the justification of indeterminate preventive commitment.
    Bijlsma J; Kooijmans T; de Jong F; Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101462. PubMed ID: 31706396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bad or Mad? Personality disorders and legal responsibility-the German situation.
    Kröber HL; Lau S
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(5):679-90. PubMed ID: 11113968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The application of evaluation tools for criminal responsibility in forensic psychiatric expertise].
    Fu PX; Wang J; Shi TT; Hu JN; Zhu MX
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 26(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 20707283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forensic psychiatric evaluations of defendants: Italy and the Netherlands compared.
    Messina E; Ferracuti S; Nicolò G; Ruggeri M; Kooijmans T; Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 66():101473. PubMed ID: 31706393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The assessment of criminal responsibility of schizophrenic rape offenders].
    Liu KC; Ye SC; Zhang QT; Cai WX
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 23(2):114-6. PubMed ID: 17619457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The RCRAS and legal insanity: a cross-validation study.
    Rogers R; Seman W; Wasyliw OE
    J Clin Psychol; 1983 Jul; 39(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 6874994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.