These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33329195)

  • 1. Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling Incorporating Item-Level Missing Data Mechanism.
    Shan N; Wang X
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():564707. PubMed ID: 33329195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the Treatment of Missing Item Responses in Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: An Illustrative Simulation Study and a Case Study Using PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.
    Robitzsch A
    Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ; 2021 Dec; 11(4):1653-1687. PubMed ID: 34940395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling Not-Reached Items in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments.
    Liang L; Lu J; Zhang J; Shi N
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():889673. PubMed ID: 35769736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joint Modeling of Compensatory Multidimensional Item Responses and Response Times.
    Man K; Harring JR; Jiao H; Zhan P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):639-654. PubMed ID: 31551641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Joint Testlet Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling for Paired Local Item Dependence in Response Times and Response Accuracy.
    Zhan P; Liao M; Bian Y
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():607. PubMed ID: 29922192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive Diagnostic Models for Random Guessing Behaviors.
    Hsu CL; Jin KY; Chiu MM
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():570365. PubMed ID: 33101139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Hierarchical Multi-Unidimensional IRT Approach for Analyzing Sparse, Multi-Group Data for Integrative Data Analysis.
    Huo Y; de la Torre J; Mun EY; Kim SY; Ray AE; Jiao Y; White HR
    Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):834-55. PubMed ID: 25265910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DIAGNOSTIC Classification Analysis of Problem-Solving Competence using Process Data: An Item Expansion Method.
    Zhan P; Qiao X
    Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1529-1547. PubMed ID: 35389193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Two-Dimensional Multiple-Choice Model Accounting for Omissions.
    Kreitchmann RS; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2540. PubMed ID: 30618961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. International Comparative Study on PISA Mathematics Achievement Test Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Models.
    Wu X; Wu R; Chang HH; Kong Q; Zhang Y
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2230. PubMed ID: 33013581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Bayesian shared parameter model for joint modeling of longitudinal continuous and binary outcomes.
    Baghfalaki T; Ganjali M; Kabir A; Pazouki A
    J Appl Stat; 2022; 49(3):638-655. PubMed ID: 35706768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct Estimation of Diagnostic Classification Model Attribute Mastery Profiles via a Collapsed Gibbs Sampling Algorithm.
    Yamaguchi K; Templin J
    Psychometrika; 2022 Dec; 87(4):1390-1421. PubMed ID: 35426059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. BayesMetab: treatment of missing values in metabolomic studies using a Bayesian modeling approach.
    Shah J; Brock GN; Gaskins J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 24):673. PubMed ID: 31861984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revisiting the 4-Parameter Item Response Model: Bayesian Estimation and Application.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1142-1163. PubMed ID: 26400070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longitudinal measurement in health-related surveys. A Bayesian joint growth model for multivariate ordinal responses.
    Verhagen J; Fox JP
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(17):2988-3005. PubMed ID: 23212734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inferring Latent Structure in Polytomous Data with a Higher-Order Diagnostic Model.
    Culpepper SA; Balamuta JJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(2):368-386. PubMed ID: 34699299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the Performances of Missing Data Handling Methods in Ability Estimation From Sparse Data.
    Xiao J; Bulut O
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Oct; 80(5):932-954. PubMed ID: 32855565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unfolding IRT Models for Likert-Type Items With a Don't Know Option.
    Liu CW; Wang WC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Oct; 40(7):517-533. PubMed ID: 29881067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.