230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33329216)
1. Grasping Weber's Law in a Virtual Environment: The Effect of Haptic Feedback.
Ozana A; Berman S; Ganel T
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():573352. PubMed ID: 33329216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Grasping trajectories in a virtual environment adhere to Weber's law.
Ozana A; Berman S; Ganel T
Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jun; 236(6):1775-1787. PubMed ID: 29663023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Active visuomotor interactions with virtual objects on touchscreens adhere to Weber's law.
Ozana A; Namdar G; Ganel T
Psychol Res; 2020 Nov; 84(8):2144-2156. PubMed ID: 31203455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Weber's law in 2D and 3D grasping.
Ozana A; Ganel T
Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):977-988. PubMed ID: 28871420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Obeying the law: speed-precision tradeoffs and the adherence to Weber's law in 2D grasping.
Ozana A; Ganel T
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 237(8):2011-2021. PubMed ID: 31161415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.
Hosang S; Chan J; Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):945-54. PubMed ID: 26680769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Weber's law in tactile grasping and manual estimation: feedback-dependent evidence for functionally distinct processing streams.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
Brain Cogn; 2014 Apr; 86():32-41. PubMed ID: 24556320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bimanual grasping does not adhere to Weber's law.
Ganel T; Namdar G; Mirsky A
Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6467. PubMed ID: 28743925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Not only perception but also grasping actions can obey Weber's law.
Derzsi Z; Volcic R
Cognition; 2023 Aug; 237():105465. PubMed ID: 37150154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical factors may explain why grasping violates Weber's law.
Utz KS; Hesse C; Aschenneller N; Schenk T
Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):22-30. PubMed ID: 25872174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Action is immune to the effects of Weber's law throughout the entire grasping trajectory.
Ganel T; Freud E; Meiran N
J Vis; 2014 Jun; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 24961248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Violations of Weber's law tell us more about methodological challenges in sensorimotor research than about the neural correlates of visual behaviour.
Schenk T; Utz KS; Hesse C
Vision Res; 2017 Nov; 140():140-143. PubMed ID: 28965858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vision for action and perception elicit dissociable adherence to Weber's law across a range of 'graspable' target objects.
Heath M; Manzone J; Khan M; Davarpanah Jazi S
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 235(10):3003-3012. PubMed ID: 28721517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bimanual Grasping Adheres to Weber's Law.
Hesse C; Harrison RE; Giesel M; Schenk T
Iperception; 2021 Nov; 12(6):20416695211054534. PubMed ID: 34868538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Memory delay and haptic feedback influence the dissociation of tactile cues for perception and action.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Hosang S; Heath M
Neuropsychologia; 2015 May; 71():91-100. PubMed ID: 25796409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pantomime-grasping: the 'return' of haptic feedback supports the absolute specification of object size.
Davarpanah Jazi S; Yau M; Westwood DA; Heath M
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2029-40. PubMed ID: 25869741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semantic grasping escapes Weber's law.
Löwenkamp C; Gärtner W; Haus ID; Franz VH
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():235-45. PubMed ID: 25731904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Both vision-for-perception and vision-for-action follow Weber's law at small object sizes, but violate it at larger sizes.
Bruno N; Uccelli S; Viviani E; de'Sperati C
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():327-334. PubMed ID: 27553269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visually and memory-guided grasping: aperture shaping exhibits a time-dependent scaling to Weber's law.
Holmes SA; Mulla A; Binsted G; Heath M
Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1941-8. PubMed ID: 21777599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grasping follows Weber's law: How to use response variability as a proxy for JND.
Bhatia K; Löwenkamp C; Franz VH
J Vis; 2022 Nov; 22(12):13. PubMed ID: 36374493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
