These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33329981)

  • 1. Outcomes of Gastrointestinal Polyps Resected Using Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (UEMR) Compared to Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (CEMR).
    Mouchli MA; Reddy S; Walsh C; Mir A; Bierle L; Chitnavis V; Yeaton P; Shakhatreh M
    Cureus; 2020 Nov; 12(11):e11485. PubMed ID: 33329981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Sessile or Flat Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Nagl S; Ebigbo A; Goelder SK; Roemmele C; Neuhaus L; Weber T; Braun G; Probst A; Schnoy E; Kafel AJ; Muzalyova A; Messmann H
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Nov; 161(5):1460-1474.e1. PubMed ID: 34371000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial : (UEMR vs. CEMR for small size non-pedunculated colorectal polyps).
    Zhang Z; Xia Y; Cui H; Yuan X; Wang C; Xie J; Tong Y; Wang W; Xu L
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):311. PubMed ID: 32967616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Intermediate-Size Colorectal Polyps.
    Yamashina T; Uedo N; Akasaka T; Iwatsubo T; Nakatani Y; Akamatsu T; Kawamura T; Takeuchi Y; Fujii S; Kusaka T; Shimokawa T
    Gastroenterology; 2019 Aug; 157(2):451-461.e2. PubMed ID: 30981791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps.
    Schenck RJ; Jahann DA; Patrie JT; Stelow EB; Cox DG; Uppal DS; Sauer BG; Shami VM; Strand DS; Wang AY
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4174-4183. PubMed ID: 28342125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Garg R; Singh A; Mohan BP; Mankaney G; Regueiro M; Chahal P
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Dec; 8(12):E1884-E1894. PubMed ID: 33269325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Underwater versus conventional EMR for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a randomized clinical trial.
    Lenz L; Martins B; Andrade de Paulo G; Kawaguti FS; Baba ER; Uemura RS; Gusmon CC; Geiger SN; Moura RN; Pennacchi C; Simas de Lima M; Safatle-Ribeiro AV; Hashimoto CL; Ribeiro U; Maluf-Filho F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Mar; 97(3):549-558. PubMed ID: 36309072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feasibility and outcomes of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥ 10 mm colorectal polyps.
    Siau K; Ishaq S; Cadoni S; Kuwai T; Yusuf A; Suzuki N
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2656-2663. PubMed ID: 29101560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Depth of the cutting plane with underwater and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized study.
    Matsueda K; Takeuchi Y; Kitamura M; Yamashina T; Akasaka T; Iwatsubo T; Nakatani Y; Akamatsu T; Kawamura T; Fujii S; Kusaka T; Shimokawa T; Uedo N
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Apr; 37(4):741-748. PubMed ID: 34978107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sundaram S; Seth V; Jearth V; Giri S
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2023 May; 115(5):225-233. PubMed ID: 36148677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of colon polyps superior to conventional techniques? A network analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection.
    Tan DJH; Ng CH; Lim XC; Lim WH; Yuen LZH; Koh JH; Nistala KRY; Ho KY; Chong CS; Muthiah MD
    Endosc Int Open; 2022 Jan; 10(1):E154-E162. PubMed ID: 35047346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Underwater versus conventional EMR of large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Rodríguez Sánchez J; Alvarez-Gonzalez MA; Pellisé M; Coto-Ugarte D; Uchima H; Aranda-Hernández J; Santiago García J; Marín-Gabriel JC; Riu Pons F; Nogales O; Carreño Macian R; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Hernández L; Patrón GO; Rodriguez-Tellez M; Redondo-Cerezo E; Sánchez Alonso M; Daca M; Valdivielso-Cortazar E; Álvarez Delgado A; Enguita M; Montori S; Albéniz E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 May; 97(5):941-951.e2. PubMed ID: 36572129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can underwater endoscopic mucosal resection be an alternative to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors?
    Tanaka H; Urabe Y; Takemoto H; Ishibashi K; Konishi H; Matsubara Y; Takehara Y; Morimoto S; Tanino F; Yamamoto N; Teshima H; Mizuno J; Hirata I; Tamari H; Tsuboi A; Yamashita K; Kotachi T; Takigawa H; Yuge R; Oka S
    DEN Open; 2024 Apr; 4(1):e312. PubMed ID: 37927952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does completing advanced endoscopy fellowship improve outcomes after endoscopic mucosal resection?
    Mouchli M; Bierle L; Reddy S; Walsh C; Mir A; Yeaton P; Chitnavis V
    Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino); 2023 Sep; 69(3):344-350. PubMed ID: 33793165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Underwater
    Ni DQ; Lu YP; Liu XQ; Gao LY; Huang X
    World J Clin Cases; 2020 Oct; 8(20):4826-4837. PubMed ID: 33195650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resection depth and layer of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection of intermediate-sized colorectal polyps: A pilot study.
    Nomura H; Tsuji S; Utsunomiya M; Kawasaki A; Tsuji K; Yoshida N; Takemura K; Katayanagi K; Minato H; Doyama H
    Endosc Int Open; 2022 Aug; 10(8):E1037-E1044. PubMed ID: 35979030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Yamashina T; Hanaoka N; Setoyama T; Watanabe J; Banno M; Marusawa H
    Cureus; 2021 Aug; 13(8):e17261. PubMed ID: 34540484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Non-ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lee JG; Lee SP; Jang HJ; Kae SH
    Dig Dis Sci; 2023 Apr; 68(4):1482-1491. PubMed ID: 36346490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10 mm sessile or flat colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang X; Wang Y; Cao X; Zhang C; Miao L
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0299931. PubMed ID: 38451998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    de Souza MHG; do Espirito Santo PA; Maluf-Filho F; Lenz L
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):208. PubMed ID: 37552342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.