158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33330237)
1. Difference in glenoid retroversion between two-dimensional axial computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstructed images.
Kim H; Yoo CH; Park SB; Song HS
Clin Shoulder Elb; 2020 Jun; 23(2):71-79. PubMed ID: 33330237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of standard two-dimensional and three-dimensional corrected glenoid version measurements.
Budge MD; Lewis GS; Schaefer E; Coquia S; Flemming DJ; Armstrong AD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2011 Jun; 20(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 21324716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiographic characterization of the B2 glenoid: the effect of computed tomographic axis orientation.
Chalmers PN; Salazar D; Chamberlain A; Keener JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Feb; 26(2):258-264. PubMed ID: 27592372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of CT-based measurements of glenoid version for total shoulder arthroplasty.
Hoenecke HR; Hermida JC; Flores-Hernandez C; D'Lima DD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2010 Mar; 19(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 19959378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional measures of posterior bone loss and retroversion in Walch B2 glenoids predict the need for an augmented anatomic glenoid component.
Cronin KJ; Kirsch JM; Gates S; Patel MS; Joyce CD; Hill BW; Gutman MJ; Williams GR; Namdari S
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2386-2392. PubMed ID: 33753274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of glenoid version and inclination using two-dimensional images from computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstructed bone models.
Choi CH; Kim HC; Kang D; Kim JY
Clin Shoulder Elb; 2020 Sep; 23(3):119-124. PubMed ID: 33330245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated Three-Dimensional Measurement of Glenoid Version and Inclination in Arthritic Shoulders.
Boileau P; Cheval D; Gauci MO; Holzer N; Chaoui J; Walch G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jan; 100(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 29298261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio-"best fit circle"-method even with three-dimensional computed tomography.
Lacheta L; Herbst E; Voss A; Braun S; Jungmann P; Millett PJ; Imhoff A; Martetschläger F
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Oct; 27(10):3222-3229. PubMed ID: 30725122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability and reliability of 2-dimensional vs. 3-dimensional glenoid version measurements with 3-dimensional preoperative planning software.
Reid JJ; Kunkle BF; Greene AT; Eichinger JK; Friedman RJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 34411724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Hudek R; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 28162884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Walch B2 glenoids: 2-dimensional vs 3-dimensional comparison of humeral head subluxation and glenoid retroversion.
Neyton L; Gröger F; Rattier S; Hirakawa Y
JSES Int; 2022 May; 6(3):421-428. PubMed ID: 35572433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlates With Computed Tomography for Glenoid Version Calculation Despite Lack of Visibility of Medial Scapula.
Parada SA; Shaw KA; Antosh IJ; Eichinger JK; Li X; Curry EJ; Provencher MT
Arthroscopy; 2020 Jan; 36(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 31864608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability.
Kubicka AM; Stefaniak J; Lubiatowski P; Długosz J; Dzianach M; Redman M; Piontek J; Romanowski L
Int Orthop; 2016 Dec; 40(12):2581-2588. PubMed ID: 27492723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional geometry of the normal shoulder: a software analysis.
Gauci MO; Deransart P; Chaoui J; Urvoy M; Athwal GS; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Boileau P; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Dec; 29(12):e468-e477. PubMed ID: 32807728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-dimensional glenoid version measurements vary with coronal and sagittal scapular rotation.
Bryce CD; Davison AC; Lewis GS; Wang L; Flemming DJ; Armstrong AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92(3):692-9. PubMed ID: 20194328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three dimensional scapular prints for evaluating glenoid morphology: An exploratory study.
Al Najjar M; Mehta SS; Monga P
J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2018; 9(3):230-235. PubMed ID: 30202154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of sagittal rotation of the glenoid on axial glenoid width and glenoid version in computed tomography scan imaging.
Gross DJ; Golijanin P; Dumont GD; Parada SA; Vopat BG; Reinert SE; Romeo AA; Provencher CD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jan; 25(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 26423023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining glenoid component version after total shoulder arthroplasty.
Mehta MP; Vogel LA; Shiu BB; Dennis ER; Petkovic D; Levine WN; Jobin CM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Sep; 27(9):1588-1595. PubMed ID: 29759906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability.
van de Bunt F; Pearl ML; Lee EK; Peng L; Didomenico P
Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Nov; 44(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 26201674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of predisposing scapular anatomy with a statistical shape model-Part II: shoulder osteoarthritis.
Verhaegen F; Meynen A; Debeer P; Scheys L
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Sep; 30(9):e558-e571. PubMed ID: 33600897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
