188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33330650)
1. Cardiac Ambulatory Monitoring: New Wireless Device Validated Against Conventional Holter Monitoring in a Case Series.
Murali S; Brugger N; Rincon F; Mashru M; Cook S; Goy JJ
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2020; 7():587945. PubMed ID: 33330650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring.
Barrett PM; Komatireddy R; Haaser S; Topol S; Sheard J; Encinas J; Fought AJ; Topol EJ
Am J Med; 2014 Jan; 127(1):95.e11-7. PubMed ID: 24384108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing 14-day adhesive patch with 24-h Holter monitoring.
Cheung CC; Kerr CR; Krahn AD
Future Cardiol; 2014 May; 10(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 24976467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhanced detection of cardiac arrhythmias utilizing 14-day continuous ECG patch monitoring.
Liu CM; Chang SL; Yeh YH; Chung FP; Hu YF; Chou CC; Hung KC; Chang PC; Liao JN; Chan YH; Lo LW; Wu LS; Lin YJ; Wen MS; Chen SA
Int J Cardiol; 2021 Jun; 332():78-84. PubMed ID: 33727122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The quality of ECG data acquisition, and diagnostic performance of a novel adhesive patch for ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring in arrhythmia detection.
Karaoğuz MR; Yurtseven E; Aslan G; Deliormanlı BG; Adıgüzel Ö; Gönen M; Li KM; Yılmaz EN
J Electrocardiol; 2019; 54():28-35. PubMed ID: 30851474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period.
Karunadas CP; Mathew C
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J; 2020; 20(2):49-53. PubMed ID: 31866554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The efficacy of detecting arrhythmia is higher with 7-day continuous electrocardiographic patch monitoring than with 24-h Holter monitoring.
Kim JY; Oh IY; Lee H; Lee JH; Cho Y; Gil Y; Jung S; Kim DI; Shin MG; Yoo JY; Kwak JY
J Arrhythm; 2023 Jun; 39(3):422-429. PubMed ID: 37324764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of continuous 24-hour and 14-day ECG monitoring for the detection of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with ischemic stroke or syncope.
Chen WC; Wu YL; Hsu YC; Hsu JT; Tseng HP; Chen CC; Chiang MH; Hsiao JF; Chin SK; Huang YL; Lei MH
Clin Cardiol; 2024 Feb; 47(3):e24247. PubMed ID: 38450794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Applicability of a Novel Wearable Wireless Electrocardiogram Monitoring Device (Spyder) for Arrhythmia Detection in Patients with Suspected Cardiac Arrhythmias.
Van Chien D; Thanh Binh N; Dung N; Truong Son P
Cardiol Res Pract; 2021; 2021():8496351. PubMed ID: 34868676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the diagnostic value of a small, single channel, electrocardiogram monitoring patch with a standard 3-lead Holter system over 24 hours in dogs.
Schreiber N; Willis R; Glaus T; Baron Toaldo M
J Vet Cardiol; 2023 Jun; 47():47-54. PubMed ID: 37196397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Arrhythmia Detection by 24-Hour Holter and 14-Day Continuous Electrocardiography Patch Monitoring.
Chua SK; Chen LC; Lien LM; Lo HM; Liao ZY; Chao SP; Chuang CY; Chiu CZ
Acta Cardiol Sin; 2020 May; 36(3):251-259. PubMed ID: 32425440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of Adhesive Single-Lead ECG Device Compared with Holter Monitoring among Non-Atrial Fibrillation Patients.
Kwon S; Lee SR; Choi EK; Ahn HJ; Song HS; Lee YS; Oh S
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 33946269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ambulatory Arrhythmia Detection with ZIO® XT Patch in Pediatric Patients: A Comparison of Devices.
Pradhan S; Robinson JA; Shivapour JK; Snyder CS
Pediatr Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):921-924. PubMed ID: 30937502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Holter-determined arrhythmias in young elite athletes with suspected risk: Insights from a 20-year experience.
Boraita A; Heras ME; Valenzuela PL; Diaz-Gonzalez L; Morales-Acuna F; Alcocer-Ayuga M; Bartolomé-Mateos S; Santos-Lozano A; Lucia A
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():896148. PubMed ID: 35935632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of the pacemaker event recorder versus Holter-ECG to detect both symptomatic and asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias.
Sampaio SMV; Craveiro NM; Darrieux F; de Oliveira ÍM; Scanavacca M; Hachul D
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):154-159. PubMed ID: 29064614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ambulatory cardiac monitoring for discharged emergency department patients with possible cardiac arrhythmias.
Schreiber D; Sattar A; Drigalla D; Higgins S
West J Emerg Med; 2014 Mar; 15(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 24672611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recognition of Supraventricular Arrhythmias in Holter ECG Recordings by ECHOView Color Map: A Case Series Study.
Naydenov S; Jekova I; Krasteva V
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis; 2023 Aug; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 37754789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a novel single lead ambulatory ECG monitor - Cardiostat™ - Compared to a standard ECG Holter monitoring.
Nault I; André P; Plourde B; Leclerc F; Sarrazin JF; Philippon F; O'Hara G; Molin F; Steinberg C; Roy K; Blier L; Champagne J
J Electrocardiol; 2019; 53():57-63. PubMed ID: 30641305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying arrhythmias in adults with congenital heart disease by 24-h ambulatory electrocardiography.
Rodriguez FH; Moodie DS; Neeland M; Adams GJ; Snyder CS
Pediatr Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 33(4):591-5. PubMed ID: 22318853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pilot evaluation of an integrated monitor-adhesive patch for long-term cardiac arrhythmia detection in India.
Shrivastav M; Padte S; Arora V; Biffi M
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2014 Jan; 12(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 24325206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
