These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33330702)

  • 1. The Influence of Predictability and Controllability on Stress Responses to the Aversive Component of a Virtual Fence.
    Kearton T; Marini D; Cowley F; Belson S; Keshavarzi H; Mayes B; Lee C
    Front Vet Sci; 2020; 7():580523. PubMed ID: 33330702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Virtual Fencing Stimuli on Stress Responses and Behavior in Sheep.
    Kearton T; Marini D; Cowley F; Belson S; Lee C
    Animals (Basel); 2019 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 30669563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing an Ethically Acceptable Virtual Fencing System for Sheep.
    Marini D; Meuleman MD; Belson S; Rodenburg TB; Llewellyn R; Lee C
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Feb; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 29495478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pre-Exposure to an Electrical Stimulus Primes Associative Pairing of Audio and Electrical Stimuli for Dairy Heifers in a Virtual Fencing Feed Attractant Trial.
    Verdon M; Lee C; Marini D; Rawnsley R
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Jan; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 32013020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controlling Within-Field Sheep Movement Using Virtual Fencing.
    Marini D; Llewellyn R; Belson S; Lee C
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Feb; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 29495364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Virtual Fencing Is Comparable to Electric Tape Fencing for Cattle Behavior and Welfare.
    Campbell DLM; Lea JM; Keshavarzi H; Lee C
    Front Vet Sci; 2019; 6():445. PubMed ID: 31921906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social influence on the effectiveness of virtual fencing in sheep.
    Marini D; Kearton T; Ouzman J; Llewellyn R; Belson S; Lee C
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10066. PubMed ID: 33062448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Framework to Assess the Impact of New Animal Management Technologies on Welfare: A Case Study of Virtual Fencing.
    Lee C; Colditz IG; Campbell DLM
    Front Vet Sci; 2018; 5():187. PubMed ID: 30186841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ability of ewes with lambs to learn a virtual fencing system.
    Brunberg EI; Bergslid IK; Bøe KE; Sørheim KM
    Animal; 2017 Nov; 11(11):2045-2050. PubMed ID: 28490388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporary Exclusion of Cattle from a Riparian Zone Using Virtual Fencing Technology.
    Campbell DLM; Haynes SJ; Lea JM; Farrer WJ; Lee C
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Dec; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 30583490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tech-Savvy Beef Cattle? How Heifers Respond to Moving Virtual Fence Lines.
    Campbell DLM; Lea JM; Farrer WJ; Haynes SJ; Lee C
    Animals (Basel); 2017 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 28926989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Assess the Welfare Impacts of a New Virtual Fencing Technology.
    Lee C; Campbell DLM
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():637709. PubMed ID: 33708813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How do grazing beef and dairy cattle respond to virtual fences? A review.
    Wilms L; Komainda M; Hamidi D; Riesch F; Horn J; Isselstein J
    J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38619181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Virtual Fence Responses Are Socially Facilitated in Beef Cattle.
    Keshavarzi H; Lee C; Lea JM; Campbell DLM
    Front Vet Sci; 2020; 7():543158. PubMed ID: 33195516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immediate and proactive effects of controllability and predictability on plasma cortisol responses to shocks in dogs.
    Dess NK; Linwick D; Patterson J; Overmier JB; Levine S
    Behav Neurosci; 1983 Dec; 97(6):1005-16. PubMed ID: 6651957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Behavioral Adaptations of Nursing Brangus Cows to Virtual Fencing: Insights from a Training Deployment Phase.
    Nyamuryekung'e S; Cox A; Perea A; Estell R; Cibils AF; Holland JP; Waterhouse T; Duff G; Funk M; McIntosh MM; Spiegal S; Bestelmeyer B; Utsumi S
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Nov; 13(22):. PubMed ID: 38003174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Should Dairy Cattle Be Trained to a Virtual Fence System as Individuals or in Groups?
    Colusso PI; Clark CEF; Lomax S
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 33003613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards a Virtual Fencing System: Training Domestic Sheep Using Audio Stimuli.
    Kleanthous N; Hussain A; Sneddon J; Khan W; Khan B; Aung Z; Liatsis P
    Animals (Basel); 2022 Oct; 12(21):. PubMed ID: 36359044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controllability modulates the neural response to predictable but not unpredictable threat in humans.
    Wood KH; Wheelock MD; Shumen JR; Bowen KH; Ver Hoef LW; Knight DC
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():371-81. PubMed ID: 26149610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does Virtual Fencing Work for Grazing Dairy Cattle?
    Lomax S; Colusso P; Clark CEF
    Animals (Basel); 2019 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 31288490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.