These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3333072)
21. The right of people with disabilities to exercise their right to vote under the Help America Vote Act. Kanter A; Russo R Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2006; 30(6):852-7. PubMed ID: 17265747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The constitutional right to use in vitro fertilization. Wright GM; Zimmerly JG Leg Med; 1982; ():239-55. PubMed ID: 7121182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The right to vote for the institutionalized mentally retarded. Kemp DR N Engl J Hum Serv; 1984; 4(2):34-9. PubMed ID: 10289559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A right to health care?: A comparative perspective. Giesen D Health Matrix Clevel; 1994; 4(2):277-95. PubMed ID: 10142772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The abortion alternative and the patient's right to know. Shapiro SC Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1979 Dec; (10):5-48. PubMed ID: 10295000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Consensual sex without assuming the risk of carrying an unwanted fetus; another foundation for the right to an abortion. Walen A Brooklyn Law Rev; 1997; 63():1051-140. PubMed ID: 12173635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Too close for comfort: protesting outside medical facilities. Harv Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 101(8):1856-75. PubMed ID: 10288538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The right to refuse medical treatment. Moody C Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1991; 36(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 10108973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground. Fried MG Conscience; 2005-2006; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Editorial: Life, liberty and the right to health care. Am Nurse; 1976 Sep; 8(11):4. PubMed ID: 1048885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Ensuring the right to minimally adequate habilitation: a proposed role for human rights committees. Reese RM Ment Retard; 1984 Jun; 22(3):142-6. PubMed ID: 6727648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. HR 1206--Patient Identifying Confidentiality Act of 1989. J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 Sep; 60(9):17-8. PubMed ID: 10295504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The fetus as a patient: emerging rights as a person? Lenow JL Am J Law Med; 1983; 9(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 6638018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Financial penalties for failing to honor patient wishes to refuse treatment. Gasner MR Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1992 Oct; (164):9-30. PubMed ID: 10122296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Is self-abortion a fundamental right? Alford SM Duke Law J; 2003 Mar; 52(5):1011-29. PubMed ID: 12964572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Abortion and the rhetoric of individual rights. Churchill LR; Simán JJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Feb; 12(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 7068371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion: issues of access, policy, rights continue to be tested. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1980 Feb; 54(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 7351319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The Cruzan decision. Franklin C Am J Med; 1995 Apr; 98(4):416. PubMed ID: 7709957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Inconsistencies in the legal status of an unborn child: recognition of a fetus as potential life. Shah MK Hofstra Law Rev; 2001; 29(3):931-69. PubMed ID: 16189918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]