These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3333101)

  • 1. [Influences of hardness of heavy-body-type silicone impression materials on dimensional accuracy of stone dies].
    Nakamura Y
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1986 Sep; 12(3):343-66. PubMed ID: 3333101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Dimensional change and deformation on stone dies for full cast crowns. Differences according to impression methods using vinyl silicone impression materials].
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe M; Tejima R; Takigawa T
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1989 Jun; 27(2):429-40. PubMed ID: 2700283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The physical properties of silicone impression materials with hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity. Wetting, water absorption, surface structure of dental stone and dimensional change on stone dies].
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Takenaka M; Abe T
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1105-14. PubMed ID: 2135145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Surfaces of stone models made by the laminated single impression technique with silicone materials (author's transl)].
    Daito K; Miyauchi H; Okuno T; Mitani S; Takatsu T
    Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jun; 31(2):27-31. PubMed ID: 4620680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Studies on reproducibility of sharp angles to stone models].
    Sato H
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1986 Sep; 12(3):397-413. PubMed ID: 3333102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Setting expansion of dental stone in hydrophilic addition type silicone impression].
    Kakuta K; Ogura H; Miyagawa Y; Kashiwagi Y
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Sep; 8(5):736-40. PubMed ID: 2490217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between critical convergence angle and surface defects in stone casts.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Aug; 21(8):675-9. PubMed ID: 2094872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials.
    Al-Bakri IA; Hussey D; Al-Omari WM
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 17508620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of dies captured by an intraoral digital impression system using parallel confocal imaging.
    Kim SY; Kim MJ; Han JS; Yeo IS; Lim YJ; Kwon HB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(2):161-3. PubMed ID: 23476911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Changes in the shape and dimensions of stone dies in relation to various materials and methods of preparation].
    Sandig C
    Protet Stomatol; 1981; 31(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 7036222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials. Part I: Single die.
    Chaffee NR; Bailey JH; Sherrard DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 9051599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Dimensional changes of stone models made by the laminated single impression technique with silicone materials (author's transl)].
    Kurosaki N; Takatsu T; Kezuka K; Kuroiwa S; Yokoyama H
    Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jun; 31(2):21-6. PubMed ID: 4620679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between the degree of deformation of the stone die and the amount of the master die undercut. Part 1. Single tooth die.
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Takenaka M
    Aichi Gakuin Dent Sci; 1989; 2():57-65. PubMed ID: 2701499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Impression and model materials, a functional unit].
    Finger W; Lockowandt P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Jul; 27(7):620-4. PubMed ID: 4557300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The dimensional accuracy of 12 impression material and die stone combinations.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD; Sutow EJ; MacSween R
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 1781880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of accuracy and the time-dependent dimensional stability of silicone based impression materials].
    Yavuzyilmaz H; Dinçer C; Nalbant L
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 Sep; 16(3):425-8. PubMed ID: 2489491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.