BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33331241)

  • 1. Preferential Reaching and End-State Comfort: How Task Demands Influence Motor Planning.
    Salters D; Rios PC; Ramsay E; Scharoun Benson SM
    J Mot Behav; 2021; 53(6):737-749. PubMed ID: 33331241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of grasping habits and object orientation on motor planning in children and adults.
    Jovanovic B; Schwarzer G
    Dev Psychobiol; 2017 Dec; 59(8):949-957. PubMed ID: 29071707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hand and Grasp Selection in a Preferential Reaching Task: The Effects of Object Location, Orientation, and Task Intention.
    Scharoun SM; Scanlan KA; Bryden PJ
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():360. PubMed ID: 27014165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hand selection in a preferential reaching task: The effects of object location, orientation, and task intention in preadolescent children.
    Scharoun Benson SM; Forsyth A; Bryden PJ
    Brain Behav; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e01025. PubMed ID: 30099858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children.
    Bryden PJ; Roy EA
    Dev Psychobiol; 2006 Mar; 48(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 16489592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-task interference in action programming and action planning - Evidence from the end-state comfort effect.
    Löhr-Limpens M; Göhringer F; Schenk T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Aug; 228():103637. PubMed ID: 35690027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors influencing planning of a familiar grasp to an object: what it is to pick a cup.
    Rounis E; Zhang Z; Pizzamiglio G; Duta M; Humphreys G
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Apr; 235(4):1281-1296. PubMed ID: 28204861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of object size on second-order planning in an overturned cup task.
    Scharoun Benson SM
    Psychol Res; 2022 Mar; 86(2):642-650. PubMed ID: 33813623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hand preference for unimanual and bimanual tasks: Evidence from questionnaires and preferential reaching.
    Salters D; Scharoun Benson SM
    Laterality; 2022 May; 27(3):308-323. PubMed ID: 34658296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reaching patterns across working space: the effects of handedness, task demands, and comfort levels.
    Mamolo CM; Roy EA; Rohr LE; Bryden PJ
    Laterality; 2006 Sep; 11(5):465-92. PubMed ID: 16882557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Under what conditions will right-handers use their left hand? The effects of object orientation, object location, arm position, and task complexity in preferential reaching.
    Bryden PJ; Huszczynski J
    Laterality; 2011 Nov; 16(6):722-36. PubMed ID: 21391107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Knoblauch A; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):529-38. PubMed ID: 25370347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Limits of end-state planning.
    Hermens F; Kral D; Rosenbaum DA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():148-62. PubMed ID: 24531145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schütz C; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22885998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motor planning in different grasping tasks by capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.).
    Sabbatini G; Meglio G; Truppa V
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 312():201-11. PubMed ID: 27283976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 215(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 21938544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development of the grasp height effect as a measure of efficient action planning in children.
    Jovanovic B; Schwarzer G
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jan; 153():74-82. PubMed ID: 27701010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The continuous end-state comfort effect: weighted integration of multiple biases.
    Herbort O; Butz MV
    Psychol Res; 2012 May; 76(3):345-63. PubMed ID: 21499901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. End-state comfort in two object manipulation tasks: Investigating how the movement context influences planning in children, young adults, and older adults.
    Scharoun Benson SM; Roy EA; Bryden PJ
    Dev Psychobiol; 2018 Apr; 60(3):317-323. PubMed ID: 29411871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Habitual and goal-directed factors in (everyday) object handling.
    Herbort O; Butz MV
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 213(4):371-82. PubMed ID: 21748333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.