These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33331403)

  • 21. Probabilistic approaches to better quantifying the results of epidemiologic studies.
    Gustafson P; McCandless LC
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2010 Apr; 7(4):1520-39. PubMed ID: 20617044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Thinking one step ahead: strategies to strengthen epidemiological data for use in risk assessment.
    Arnold C
    Environ Health Perspect; 2014 Nov; 122(11):A311. PubMed ID: 25361211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Limitations of direct immunoassays for measuring circulating estradiol levels in postmenopausal women and men in epidemiologic studies.
    Stanczyk FZ; Jurow J; Hsing AW
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Apr; 19(4):903-6. PubMed ID: 20332268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimizing prevalence estimates for a novel pathogen by reducing uncertainty in test characteristics.
    Larremore DB; Fosdick BK; Zhang S; Grad YH
    Epidemics; 2022 Dec; 41():100634. PubMed ID: 36191537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimating the prevalence of multiple diseases from two-stage hierarchical pooling.
    Warasi MS; Tebbs JM; McMahan CS; Bilder CR
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(21):3851-64. PubMed ID: 27090057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Verbal autopsy: a method for epidemiologic studies in developing countries. Experiences from apoplexy cases].
    Truelsen T; Boysen G
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Oct; 162(40):5366-7. PubMed ID: 11036455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Counterfactual approach in epidemiological studies on air pollution effects].
    Baccini M
    Epidemiol Prev; 2017; 41(3-4):156-157. PubMed ID: 28929705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Should one have confidence in epidemiological surveys?].
    Bréart G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Mar; 31(3):275-7. PubMed ID: 12839002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Participation in population studies.
    Hartge P
    Epidemiology; 2006 May; 17(3):252-4. PubMed ID: 16617271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of diagnostic tests in veterinary epidemiologic studies.
    Greiner M; Gardner IA
    Prev Vet Med; 2000 May; 45(1-2):43-59. PubMed ID: 10802333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Can we screen for pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination in epidemiologic studies?
    Barber MD; Neubauer NL; Klein-Olarte V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Oct; 195(4):942-8. PubMed ID: 16681989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Low P-values or narrow confidence intervals: which are more durable?
    Poole C
    Epidemiology; 2001 May; 12(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 11337599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multiplicative Interactions Under Differential Outcome Measurement Error with Perfect Specificity.
    VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2019 May; 30(3):e15-e16. PubMed ID: 30789429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sensitivity analysis when data are missing not-at-random.
    Resseguier N; Giorgi R; Paoletti X
    Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):282. PubMed ID: 21293212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? The best RCT still trumps the best observational study.
    Barton S
    BMJ; 2000 Jul; 321(7256):255-6. PubMed ID: 10915111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Survey Definitions of Gout for Epidemiologic Studies: Comparison With Crystal Identification as the Gold Standard.
    Dalbeth N; Schumacher HR; Fransen J; Neogi T; Jansen TL; Brown M; Louthrenoo W; Vazquez-Mellado J; Eliseev M; McCarthy G; Stamp LK; Perez-Ruiz F; Sivera F; Ea HK; Gerritsen M; Scire CA; Cavagna L; Lin C; Chou YY; Tausche AK; da Rocha Castelar-Pinheiro G; Janssen M; Chen JH; Cimmino MA; Uhlig T; Taylor WJ
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2016 Dec; 68(12):1894-1898. PubMed ID: 27014846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Epidemiologic issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests.
    Greiner M; Gardner IA
    Prev Vet Med; 2000 May; 45(1-2):3-22. PubMed ID: 10802331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Meta-epidemiologic study showed frequent time trends in summary estimates from meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Cohen JF; Korevaar DA; Wang J; Leeflang MM; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 77():60-67. PubMed ID: 27212137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of self-reported hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gonçalves VSS; Andrade KRC; Carvalho KMB; Silva MT; Pereira MG; Galvao TF
    J Hypertens; 2018 May; 36(5):970-978. PubMed ID: 29232280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The two-dimensional Monte Carlo: a new methodologic paradigm for dose reconstruction for epidemiological studies.
    Simon SL; Hoffman FO; Hofer E
    Radiat Res; 2015 Jan; 183(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 25496314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.