152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33333152)
1. Impact of second-opinion dermatopathology reviews on surgical management of malignant neoplasms.
Lohman ME; Grekin RC; North JP; Neuhaus IM
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 May; 84(5):1385-1392. PubMed ID: 33333152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discrepancies in dermatopathology diagnoses: the role of second review policies and dermatopathology fellowship training.
Gaudi S; Zarandona JM; Raab SS; English JC; Jukic DM
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 22892284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Second-Opinion Strategies for Diagnoses of Cutaneous Melanocytic Lesions.
Piepkorn MW; Longton GM; Reisch LM; Elder DE; Pepe MS; Kerr KF; Tosteson ANA; Nelson HD; Knezevich S; Radick A; Shucard H; Onega T; Carney PA; Elmore JG; Barnhill RL
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Oct; 2(10):e1912597. PubMed ID: 31603483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The importance of reviewing pathology specimens before Mohs surgery.
Butler ST; Youker SR; Mandrell J; Flanagan KH; Fosko SW
Dermatol Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):407-12. PubMed ID: 19175663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Who sends what: a comparison of dermatopathology referrals from dermatologists, pathologists and dermatopathologists.
Goldenberg G; Camacho F; Gildea J; Golitz LE
J Cutan Pathol; 2008 Jul; 35(7):658-61. PubMed ID: 18201232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the value of second opinion pathology review.
Farooq A; Abdelkader A; Javakhishivili N; Moreno GA; Kuderer P; Polley M; Hunt B; Giorgadze TA; Jorns JM
Int J Qual Health Care; 2021 Mar; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 33644816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discordance of histopathologic parameters in cutaneous melanoma: Clinical implications.
Patrawala S; Maley A; Greskovich C; Stuart L; Parker D; Swerlick R; Stoff B
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2016 Jan; 74(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 26514601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Second opinion oral pathology referrals in New Zealand.
Seo B; Hussaini HM; Rich AM
Pathology; 2017 Apr; 49(3):277-284. PubMed ID: 28274671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of second opinion surgical pathology on the practice of head and neck surgery: a decade experience at a large referral hospital.
Westra WH; Kronz JD; Eisele DW
Head Neck; 2002 Jul; 24(7):684-93. PubMed ID: 12112543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Discrepancies in Mandatory Slide Review of Extradepartmental Head and Neck Cases: Experience at a Large Academic Center.
Mehrad M; Chernock RD; El-Mofty SK; Lewis JS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Dec; 139(12):1539-45. PubMed ID: 26619026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discordance in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanoma at a melanoma referral center.
Shoo BA; Sagebiel RW; Kashani-Sabet M
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 May; 62(5):751-6. PubMed ID: 20303612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Invisible dermatosis, diagnostic discrepancy between the general pathologist and dermatopathologist.
Alhumidi A; Alshamlan N; Alfaraidi M; Mohajer K
J Cutan Pathol; 2019 Dec; 46(12):905-912. PubMed ID: 31373705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical pathological second opinion in thyroid malignancy: impact on patients' management and prognosis.
Hamady ZZ; Mather N; Lansdown MR; Davidson L; Maclennan KA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2005 Feb; 31(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 15642429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in breast cancer reports after pathology second opinion.
Marco V; Muntal T; García-Hernandez F; Cortes J; Gonzalez B; Rubio IT
Breast J; 2014; 20(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 24689830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discordance in Preoperative and Postoperative Histopathology of Sinonasal Tumors.
Ganti A; Tajudeen BA; Plitt MA; Rossi I; Gattuso P; Batra PS
Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2018 Mar; 32(2):101-105. PubMed ID: 29644900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of second opinion pathology in the definitive management of patients with bladder carcinoma.
Coblentz TR; Mills SE; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 91(7):1284-90. PubMed ID: 11283928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical Implication of Diagnostic and Histopathologic Discrepancies in Sinonasal Malignancies.
Choi KY; Amit M; Tam S; Bell D; Phan J; Garden AS; Williams MD; Ferrarotto R; El-Naggar AK; Raza SM; DeMonte F; Kupferman ME; Hanna EY; Su SY
Laryngoscope; 2021 May; 131(5):E1468-E1475. PubMed ID: 32946597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interpretation of skin biopsies by general pathologists: diagnostic discrepancy rate measured by blinded review.
Trotter MJ; Bruecks AK
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Nov; 127(11):1489-92. PubMed ID: 14567717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Institutional review of outside cytology materials: a retrospective analysis of two institutions' experiences.
Layfield LJ; Jones C; Rowe L; Gopez EV
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jan; 26(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 11782087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
