These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33333166)

  • 1. A new method for synthesizing test accuracy data outperformed the bivariate method.
    Furuya-Kanamori L; Kostoulas P; Doi SAR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Apr; 132():51-58. PubMed ID: 33333166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skew-normal random-effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies.
    Negeri ZF; Beyene J
    Biom J; 2020 Sep; 62(5):1223-1244. PubMed ID: 32022315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Guolo A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):6. PubMed ID: 28077079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy with few studies or sparse data.
    Takwoingi Y; Guo B; Riley RD; Deeks JJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1896-1911. PubMed ID: 26116616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust bivariate random-effects model for accommodating outlying and influential studies in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Negeri ZF; Beyene J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3308-3325. PubMed ID: 32469266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Evaluation of Bivariate Mixed Models in Meta-analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies with SAS, Stata and R.
    Vogelgesang F; Schlattmann P; Dewey M
    Methods Inf Med; 2018 May; 57(3):111-119. PubMed ID: 29719917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-DiSc 2.0: a web application for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.
    Plana MN; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Fernández-García S; Soto J; Fabregate M; Pérez T; Roqué M; Zamora J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):306. PubMed ID: 36443653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simple and robust method for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Chen Y; Liu Y; Chu H; Ting Lee ML; Schmid CH
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):105-121. PubMed ID: 27580758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.
    Hong C; D Riley R; Chen Y
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 29055096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of computational methods for aggregate data meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Zhao Y; Khan B; Negeri ZF
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 May; 24(1):111. PubMed ID: 38730436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials II: The quality effects model.
    Doi SA; Barendregt JJ; Khan S; Thalib L; Williams GM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):123-9. PubMed ID: 26003432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
    Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Latent class bivariate model for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Eusebi P; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jul; 14():88. PubMed ID: 25015209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selecting the best meta-analytic estimator for evidence-based practice: a simulation study.
    Doi SAR; Furuya-Kanamori L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2020 Mar; 18(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 31764215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of simple pooling and bivariate model used in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy published in Chinese journals].
    Huang YS; Yang ZR; Zhan SY
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Jun; 47(3):483-8. PubMed ID: 26080880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Leeflang MM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 24274632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guidelines for diagnostic tests and diagnostic accuracy in surgical research.
    Jones CM; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
    J Invest Surg; 2010 Feb; 23(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 20233006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple thresholds for data integration.
    Shim SR
    Epidemiol Health; 2022; 44():e2022083. PubMed ID: 36228672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Dinnes J; Deeks J; Kirby J; Roderick P
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(12):1-113, iii. PubMed ID: 15774235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.