BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33333976)

  • 1. DockingApp RF: A State-of-the-Art Novel Scoring Function for Molecular Docking in a User-Friendly Interface to AutoDock Vina.
    Macari G; Toti D; Pasquadibisceglie A; Polticelli F
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Dec; 21(24):. PubMed ID: 33333976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DockingApp: a user friendly interface for facilitated docking simulations with AutoDock Vina.
    Di Muzio E; Toti D; Polticelli F
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Feb; 31(2):213-218. PubMed ID: 28063067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A New Scoring Function for Molecular Docking Based on AutoDock and AutoDock Vina.
    Tanchuk VY; Tanin VO; Vovk AI; Poda G
    Curr Drug Discov Technol; 2015; 12(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26302746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving AutoDock Vina Using Random Forest: The Growing Accuracy of Binding Affinity Prediction by the Effective Exploitation of Larger Data Sets.
    Li H; Leung KS; Wong MH; Ballester PJ
    Mol Inform; 2015 Feb; 34(2-3):115-26. PubMed ID: 27490034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accelerating AutoDock Vina with GPUs.
    Tang S; Chen R; Lin M; Lin Q; Zhu Y; Ding J; Hu H; Ling M; Wu J
    Molecules; 2022 May; 27(9):. PubMed ID: 35566391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving classical scoring functions using random forest: The non-additivity of free energy terms' contributions in binding.
    Afifi K; Al-Sadek AF
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2018 Aug; 92(2):1429-1434. PubMed ID: 29655201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vinardo: A Scoring Function Based on Autodock Vina Improves Scoring, Docking, and Virtual Screening.
    Quiroga R; Villarreal MA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155183. PubMed ID: 27171006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving protein-ligand docking and screening accuracies by incorporating a scoring function correction term.
    Zheng L; Meng J; Jiang K; Lan H; Wang Z; Lin M; Li W; Guo H; Wei Y; Mu Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 May; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35289359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A New, Improved Hybrid Scoring Function for Molecular Docking and Scoring Based on AutoDock and AutoDock Vina.
    Tanchuk VY; Tanin VO; Vovk AI; Poda G
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2016 Apr; 87(4):618-25. PubMed ID: 26643167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vina-GPU 2.0: Further Accelerating AutoDock Vina and Its Derivatives with Graphics Processing Units.
    Ding J; Tang S; Mei Z; Wang L; Huang Q; Hu H; Ling M; Wu J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Apr; 63(7):1982-1998. PubMed ID: 36941232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving scoring-docking-screening powers of protein-ligand scoring functions using random forest.
    Wang C; Zhang Y
    J Comput Chem; 2017 Jan; 38(3):169-177. PubMed ID: 27859414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AutoDock VinaXB: implementation of XBSF, new empirical halogen bond scoring function, into AutoDock Vina.
    Koebel MR; Schmadeke G; Posner RG; Sirimulla S
    J Cheminform; 2016; 8():27. PubMed ID: 27195023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Performance of Several Docking Programs at Reproducing Protein-Macrolide-Like Crystal Structures.
    Castro-Alvarez A; Costa AM; Vilarrasa J
    Molecules; 2017 Jan; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 28106755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A fully differentiable ligand pose optimization framework guided by deep learning and a traditional scoring function.
    Wang Z; Zheng L; Wang S; Lin M; Wang Z; Kong AW; Mu Y; Wei Y; Li W
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jan; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 36502369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FlexAID: Revisiting Docking on Non-Native-Complex Structures.
    Gaudreault F; Najmanovich RJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1323-36. PubMed ID: 26076070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. istar: a web platform for large-scale protein-ligand docking.
    Li H; Leung KS; Ballester PJ; Wong MH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85678. PubMed ID: 24475049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2.
    Kadukova M; Grudinin S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):151-162. PubMed ID: 28913782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.