These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33334489)

  • 1. What humanlike errors do autonomous vehicles need to avoid to maximize safety?
    Mueller AS; Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    J Safety Res; 2020 Dec; 75():310-318. PubMed ID: 33334489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence of driver physical factors leading to unintentional lane departure crashes.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul; 18(5):481-487. PubMed ID: 27740863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advancing investigation of automated vehicle crashes using text analytics of crash narratives and Bayesian analysis.
    Lee S; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 181():106932. PubMed ID: 36580765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical older driver errors in a national sample of serious U.S. crashes.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jul; 80():211-9. PubMed ID: 25916662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agricultural vehicles and rural road safety: tackling a persistent problem.
    Jaarsma CF; De Vries JR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 24279972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of teen and adult driver crash scenarios in a nationally representative sample of serious crashes.
    McDonald CC; Curry AE; Kandadai V; Sommers MS; Winston FK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():302-8. PubMed ID: 25103321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.
    Seacrist T; Douglas EC; Huang E; Megariotis J; Prabahar A; Kashem A; Elzarka A; Haber L; MacKinney T; Loeb H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S89-S96. PubMed ID: 29584473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Wu X; Glaser Y; He L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106281. PubMed ID: 34273622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characteristics of Single Vehicle Crashes with a Teen Driver in South Carolina, 2005-2008.
    Shults RA; Bergen G; Smith TJ; Cook L; Kindelberger J; West B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():325-331. PubMed ID: 28947072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Approaching autonomous driving with cautious optimism: analysis of road traffic injuries involving autonomous vehicles based on field test data.
    Ye W; Wang C; Chen F; Yan S; Li L
    Inj Prev; 2021 Feb; 27(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 31915269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptions of safety on a shared road: Driving, cycling, or walking near an autonomous vehicle.
    Pyrialakou VD; Gkartzonikas C; Gatlin JD; Gkritza K
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():249-258. PubMed ID: 32199570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A taxonomy of driving errors and violations: Evidence from the naturalistic driving study.
    Khattak AJ; Ahmad N; Wali B; Dumbaugh E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105873. PubMed ID: 33360090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploratory analysis of automated vehicle crashes in California: A text analytics & hierarchical Bayesian heterogeneity-based approach.
    Boggs AM; Wali B; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Feb; 135():105354. PubMed ID: 31790970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mining patterns of autonomous vehicle crashes involving vulnerable road users to understand the associated factors.
    Kutela B; Das S; Dadashova B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106473. PubMed ID: 34774280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing driver behavior using shrp2 adverse weather data.
    Druta C; Kassing A; Gibbons R; Alden VA
    J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():283-295. PubMed ID: 32563404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Who is to blame for crashes involving autonomous vehicles? Exploring blame attribution across the road transport system.
    Pöllänen E; Read GJM; Lane BR; Thompson J; Salmon PM
    Ergonomics; 2020 May; 63(5):525-537. PubMed ID: 32180531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. LAVIA--an evaluation of the potential safety benefits of the French intelligent speed adaptation project.
    Driscoll R; Page Y; Lassarre S; Ehrlich J
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2007; 51():485-505. PubMed ID: 18184509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using naturalistic driving data to explore the association between traffic safety-related events and crash risk at driver level.
    Wu KF; Aguero-Valverde J; Jovanis PP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():210-8. PubMed ID: 25086439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of quasi-induced exposure representativeness assumption among young drivers.
    Curry AE; Pfeiffer MR; Elliott MR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 May; 17(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 26376230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.