These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33335541)

  • 21. Challenges in exome analysis by LifeScope and its alternative computational pipelines.
    Pranckevičiene E; Rančelis T; Pranculis A; Kučinskas V
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():421. PubMed ID: 26346699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Benchmarking workflows to assess performance and suitability of germline variant calling pipelines in clinical diagnostic assays.
    Krishnan V; Utiramerur S; Ng Z; Datta S; Snyder MP; Ashley EA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Feb; 22(1):85. PubMed ID: 33627090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of genotyping-by-sequencing analysis methods on low-coverage crop datasets shows advantages of a new workflow, GB-eaSy.
    Wickland DP; Battu G; Hudson KA; Diers BW; Hudson ME
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):586. PubMed ID: 29281959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
    Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
    BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multi-centre evaluation of a comprehensive preimplantation genetic test through haplotyping-by-sequencing.
    Masset H; Zamani Esteki M; Dimitriadou E; Dreesen J; Debrock S; Derhaag J; Derks K; Destouni A; Drüsedau M; Meekels J; Melotte C; Peeraer K; Tšuiko O; van Uum C; Allemeersch J; Devogelaere B; François KO; Happe S; Lorson D; Richards RL; Theuns J; Brunner H; de Die-Smulders C; Voet T; Paulussen A; Coonen E; Vermeesch JR
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1608-1619. PubMed ID: 31348829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Concordance and reproducibility of a next generation mtGenome sequencing method for high-quality samples using the Illumina MiSeq.
    Peck MA; Brandhagen MD; Marshall C; Diegoli TM; Irwin JA; Sturk-Andreaggi K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():103-111. PubMed ID: 27368088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Deep whole-genome sequencing of 3 cancer cell lines on 2 sequencing platforms.
    Arora K; Shah M; Johnson M; Sanghvi R; Shelton J; Nagulapalli K; Oschwald DM; Zody MC; Germer S; Jobanputra V; Carter J; Robine N
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):19123. PubMed ID: 31836783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative analysis of whole-genome sequencing pipelines to minimize false negative findings.
    Hwang KB; Lee IH; Li H; Won DG; Hernandez-Ferrer C; Negron JA; Kong SW
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):3219. PubMed ID: 30824715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating the performance of tools used to call minority variants from whole genome short-read data.
    Said Mohammed K; Kibinge N; Prins P; Agoti CN; Cotten M; Nokes DJ; Brand S; Githinji G
    Wellcome Open Res; 2018; 3():21. PubMed ID: 30483597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. ReliableGenome: annotation of genomic regions with high/low variant calling concordance.
    Popitsch N; ; Schuh A; Taylor JC
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):155-160. PubMed ID: 27605105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Validation and assessment of variant calling pipelines for next-generation sequencing.
    Pirooznia M; Kramer M; Parla J; Goes FS; Potash JB; McCombie WR; Zandi PP
    Hum Genomics; 2014 Jul; 8(1):14. PubMed ID: 25078893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quartet DNA reference materials and datasets for comprehensively evaluating germline variant calling performance.
    Ren L; Duan X; Dong L; Zhang R; Yang J; Gao Y; Peng R; Hou W; Liu Y; Li J; Yu Y; Zhang N; Shang J; Liang F; Wang D; Chen H; Sun L; Hao L; ; Scherer A; Nordlund J; Xiao W; Xu J; Tong W; Hu X; Jia P; Ye K; Li J; Jin L; Hong H; Wang J; Fan S; Fang X; Zheng Y; Shi L
    Genome Biol; 2023 Nov; 24(1):270. PubMed ID: 38012772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. GalaxyTrakr: a distributed analysis tool for public health whole genome sequence data accessible to non-bioinformaticians.
    Gangiredla J; Rand H; Benisatto D; Payne J; Strittmatter C; Sanders J; Wolfgang WJ; Libuit K; Herrick JB; Prarat M; Toro M; Farrell T; Strain E
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Feb; 22(1):114. PubMed ID: 33568057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Benchmarking long-read genome sequence alignment tools for human genomics applications.
    LoTempio J; Delot E; Vilain E
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16515. PubMed ID: 38130927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genome sequencing as a platform for pharmacogenetic genotyping: a pediatric cohort study.
    Cohn I; Paton TA; Marshall CR; Basran R; Stavropoulos DJ; Ray PN; Monfared N; Hayeems RZ; Meyn MS; Bowdin S; Scherer SW; Cohn RD; Ito S
    NPJ Genom Med; 2017; 2():19. PubMed ID: 29263831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prioritizing disease-linked variants, genes, and pathways with an interactive whole-genome analysis pipeline.
    Lee IH; Lee K; Hsing M; Choe Y; Park JH; Kim SH; Bohn JM; Neu MB; Hwang KB; Green RC; Kohane IS; Kong SW
    Hum Mutat; 2014 May; 35(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 24478219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. DanMAC5: a browser of aggregated sequence variants from 8,671 whole genome sequenced Danish individuals.
    Banasik K; Møller PL; Techlo TR; Holm PC; Walters GB; Ingason A; Rosengren A; Rohde PD; Kogelman LJA; Westergaard D; Siggaard T; Chmura PJ; Chalmer MA; Magnússon ÓÞ; Þórisson GÁ; Stefánsson H; Guðbjartsson DF; Stefánsson K; Olesen J; Winther S; Bøttcher M; Brunak S; Werge T; Nyegaard M; Hansen TF
    BMC Genom Data; 2023 May; 24(1):30. PubMed ID: 37244984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Benchmarking the Effectiveness and Accuracy of Multiple Mitochondrial DNA Variant Callers: Practical Implications for Clinical Application.
    Ip EKK; Troup M; Xu C; Winlaw DS; Dunwoodie SL; Giannoulatou E
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():692257. PubMed ID: 35350246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproducibility of Variant Calls in Replicate Next Generation Sequencing Experiments.
    Qi Y; Liu X; Liu CG; Wang B; Hess KR; Symmans WF; Shi W; Pusztai L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0119230. PubMed ID: 26136146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variant Classification Concordance using the ACMG-AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines across Nine Genomic Implementation Research Studies.
    Amendola LM; Muenzen K; Biesecker LG; Bowling KM; Cooper GM; Dorschner MO; Driscoll C; Foreman AKM; Golden-Grant K; Greally JM; Hindorff L; Kanavy D; Jobanputra V; Johnston JJ; Kenny EE; McNulty S; Murali P; Ou J; Powell BC; Rehm HL; Rolf B; Roman TS; Van Ziffle J; Guha S; Abhyankar A; Crosslin D; Venner E; Yuan B; Zouk H; ; Jarvik GP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Nov; 107(5):932-941. PubMed ID: 33108757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.