These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33337412)

  • 1. Driver seat comfort for level 3-4 autonomous vehicles.
    Mansfield NJ; Walia K; Singh A
    Work; 2021; 68(s1):S111-S118. PubMed ID: 33337412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seating preferences in highly automated vehicles and occupant safety awareness: A national survey of Chinese perceptions.
    Nie B; Gan S; Chen W; Zhou Q
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(4):247-253. PubMed ID: 32275164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction.
    He D; DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):663. PubMed ID: 34348496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Driving performance and driver discomfort in an elevated and standard driving position during a driving simulation.
    Smith J; Mansfield N; Gyi D; Pagett M; Bateman B
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Jul; 49():25-33. PubMed ID: 25766419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations: The Role of Traffic Density.
    Gold C; Körber M; Lechner D; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):642-52. PubMed ID: 26984515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluate driver response to active warning system in level-2 automated vehicles.
    Atwood JR; Guo F; Blanco M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():132-138. PubMed ID: 31005004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ergonomic evaluation of a new truck seat design: a field study.
    Cardoso M; Fulton F; McKinnon C; Callaghan JP; Johnson MJ; Albert WJ
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2019 Sep; 25(3):331-343. PubMed ID: 28812453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research on the Comfort of Vehicle Passengers Considering the Vehicle Motion State and Passenger Physiological Characteristics: Improving the Passenger Comfort of Autonomous Vehicles.
    Wang C; Zhao X; Fu R; Li Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(18):. PubMed ID: 32962050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?
    Koppel S; Charlton J; Kopinathan C; Taranto D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1236-44. PubMed ID: 21376923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical investigation of prolonged driving in an ergonomically designed truck seat prototype.
    Cardoso M; McKinnon C; Viggiani D; Johnson MJ; Callaghan JP; Albert WJ
    Ergonomics; 2018 Mar; 61(3):367-380. PubMed ID: 28697645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated driving: A biomechanical approach for sleeping positions.
    Stanglmeier MJ; Paternoster FK; Paternoster S; Bichler RJ; Wagner PO; Schwirtz A
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jul; 86():103103. PubMed ID: 32342893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preface to the special section on human factors and automation in vehicles: designing highly automated vehicles with the driver in mind.
    Merat N; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):681-6. PubMed ID: 23156614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shaping driver-vehicle interaction in autonomous vehicles: How the new in-vehicle systems match the human needs.
    Sun X; Cao S; Tang P
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Jan; 90():103238. PubMed ID: 33010571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.
    Nees MA
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():61-68. PubMed ID: 31235236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Submarining sensitivity across varied anthropometry in an autonomous driving system environment.
    Rawska K; Gepner B; Kulkarni S; Chastain K; Zhu J; Richardson R; Perez-Rapela D; Forman J; Kerrigan JR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S123-S127. PubMed ID: 31539280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: A simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():202-209. PubMed ID: 30665055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility study of highway alignment design controls for autonomous vehicles.
    Ye X; Wang X; Liu S; Tarko AP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106252. PubMed ID: 34171633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles.
    He D; Kanaan D; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105842. PubMed ID: 33157393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.
    Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.