160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33337713)
1. Examination of the Safe Zone in Mandibular Ramus Osteotomies.
Sevmez F; Orhan M; Bahşi I; Yalçin ED
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 32(6):2219-2222. PubMed ID: 33337713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A simple method to locate mandibular foramen with cone-beam computed tomography and its relevance to oral and maxillofacial surgery: a radio-anatomical study.
Al-Shayyab MH
Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jun; 40(6):625-634. PubMed ID: 29737379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safe surgical access to the mandibular nerve at the infratemporal fossae.
Agbaje JO; Sun Y; Lambrichts I; Vrielinck L; Schepers S; Politis C
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1454-7. PubMed ID: 24911603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Location of the mandibular lingula: Comparison of skeletal Class I and Class III patients in relation to ramus osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomography.
Akcay H; Kalabalık F; Tatar B; Ulu M
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 120(6):504-508. PubMed ID: 31404678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between inferior alveolar nerve canal position at mandibular second molar in patients with prognathism and possible occurrence of neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Yoshioka I; Tanaka T; Khanal A; Habu M; Kito S; Kodama M; Oda M; Wakasugi-Sato N; Matsumoto-Takeda S; Fukai Y; Tokitsu T; Tomikawa M; Seta Y; Tominaga K; Morimoto Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 68(12):3022-7. PubMed ID: 20739116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-thirds anteroposterior ramus length is the preferred osteotomy point for intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Chen CM; Hsu HJ; Liang SW; Chen PH; Hsu KJ; Tseng YC
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 34327588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CBCT-based predictability of attachment of the neurovascular bundle to the proximal segment of the mandible during sagittal split osteotomy.
Agbaje JO; Sun Y; De Munter S; Schepers S; Vrielinck L; Lambrichts I; Politis C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 42(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 22925443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The unusually lower position of the mandibular foramen and the canal of the neck of mandible.
Cârstocea L; Săndulescu M; Hostiuc S; Rusu MC
Morphologie; 2020 May; 104(345):143-146. PubMed ID: 31932122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional anatomic analysis of the lingula and mandibular foramen: a cone beam computed tomography study.
Findik Y; Yildirim D; Baykul T
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):607-10. PubMed ID: 24448541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical implications of the anatomic situation of the mandibular canal for mandibular osteotomies: a cone beam computed tomographic study.
Nicol P; Loncle T; Pasquet G; Vacher C
Surg Radiol Anat; 2020 May; 42(5):509-514. PubMed ID: 31712869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anatomic study to determine a safe surgical reference point for mandibular ramus osteotomy.
Park KR; Kim SY; Kim GJ; Park HS; Jung YS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23454267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Preoperative determination of the position of mandibular canal for planning sagittal ramus osteotomy of the mandible].
Pilling E; Schneider M; Mai R; Eckelt U
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2004 Feb; 8(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 14991416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the variation in course and position of inferior alveolar nerve among south Indian population: A cone beam computed tomographic study.
Kavarthapu A; Thamaraiselvan M
Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(4):405-409. PubMed ID: 30127186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A morphometric analysis of the mandibular canal by cone beam computed tomography and its relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Chrcanovic BR; de Carvalho Machado V; Gjelvold B
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 20(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 26875084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study.
Lin MH; Mau LP; Cochran DL; Shieh YS; Huang PH; Huang RY
J Dent; 2014 Mar; 42(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 24394585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphometric study of mandibular ramus related to sagittal ramus split osteotomy and osteosynthesis.
Vinicius de Oliveira M; de Moraes PH; Olate S; Alonso MB; Watanabe PC; Haiter-Neto F; de Albergaria-Barbosa JR
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1484-7. PubMed ID: 22976641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the Levasseur-Merrill Retractor Provide Reliable In Vivo Guidance for the Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy?
Loh LHJ; Sesanto RL; Catlin KA; Oster RA; Louis PJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Nov; 80(11):1740-1746. PubMed ID: 36076359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variation in Location of the Mandibular Foramen/Inferior Alveolar Nerve Complex Given Anatomic Landmarks Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Scans.
Blacher J; Van DaHuvel S; Parashar V; Mitchell JC
J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):393-6. PubMed ID: 26786380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A simple method to locate mandibular foramen: preliminary radiological study.
Trost O; Salignon V; Cheynel N; Malka G; Trouilloud P
Surg Radiol Anat; 2010 Dec; 32(10):927-31. PubMed ID: 20217084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defining the Safe Zone for the Low Medial Horizontal Cut in the Sagittal Split Osteotomy.
Ettinger RE; Mercan E; Podolsky D; Susarla SM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 May; 80(5):822-826. PubMed ID: 35134374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
