These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. [Widths and depths of cracks in amalgam fillings and inlays]. Albert HM Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1971 Jun; 26(6):672-6. PubMed ID: 4931949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Dental amalgam--what are the alternatives? Tyas MJ Int Dent J; 1994 Aug; 44(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 7822054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The role of the porcelain inlay in restorative dentistry. Myerson RL; Dogon IL J Biomed Mater Res; 1972; 6(1):405-41. PubMed ID: 5014904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. Sjögren G; Molin M; van Dijken JW Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15119879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In search of a gold standard. Larson TD Northwest Dent; 2003; 82(6):13-8. PubMed ID: 14722988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cerec classic: the inlay with Cerec 3D step-by-step. Schenk O Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jan; 6(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 12838590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of indirect composite and ceramic inlays to restore anterior teeth: a clinical case report. Small BW Gen Dent; 1999; 47(4):364-6. PubMed ID: 10687462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12066659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An evaluation of the fit of porcelain inlays. Qualtrough AJ; Sharp RA; Piddock V Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Jun; 4(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 9171024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Porcelain inlays for the general practioner. Smith BB Dent Clin North Am; 1967 Mar; ():191-202. PubMed ID: 5334353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays. Manhart J; Chen HY; Neuerer P; Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A; Hickel R Am J Dent; 2001 Apr; 14(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11507807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]