These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3333859)

  • 21. Amalgam shear bond strength to dentin using single-bottle primer/adhesive systems.
    Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 1999 Oct; 12(5):222-6. PubMed ID: 10649912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Shear bond strength, microleakage, and confocal studies of 4 amalgam alloy bonding agents.
    Grobler SR; Oberholzer TG; Rossouw RJ; Grobler-Rabie A; Van Wyk Kotze TJ
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(7):501-8. PubMed ID: 11203971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal leakage of dental amalgam.
    Fanian F; Hadvi F; Asgar K
    Oper Dent; 1983; 8(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 6344027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bond strengths and SEM morphology of dentin-amalgam adhesives.
    Ramos JC; Perdigão J
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 9580238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bond strengths of a porcelain material to different abutment substrates.
    Ferrari M; Mannocci F; Vichi A; Goracci G
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 11203834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Flexural strength of repaired high-copper amalgam.
    Brown KB; Molvar MP; Demarest VA; Hasegawa TK; Heinecke PN
    Oper Dent; 1986; 11(4):131-5. PubMed ID: 3468487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of surface treatment on orthodontic bonding to amalgam.
    Skilton JW; Tyas MJ; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 16792246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A new multipurpose dental adhesive for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond-strength study.
    Harari D; Aunni E; Gillis I; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 10982932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Allen J; Rhodes B
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 9484142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bonding of adhesive resin luting agents to metal and amalgam.
    Osman SA; McCabe JF; Walls AW
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Dec; 16(4):171-6. PubMed ID: 19177728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces.
    Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 6576493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access.
    Hachmeister KA; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF; Larsen RB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of surface treatment on bond strength of low-fusing porcelain to commercially pure titanium.
    Al Hussaini I; Al Wazzan KA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 16198172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Expansion of contaminated amalgams assessed by photoelastic resin.
    Osborne JW
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Oct; 30(10):673-81. PubMed ID: 10765851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of amalgam to tooth structure using two bonding agents--lutting glass ionomer and 4-META.
    Sheela K; Sudeep PT; Hegde V; Francis RF; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1998; 9(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10530186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Shear bond strength of amalgam adhesives to dentin.
    Kawakami M; Staninec M; Imazato S; Torii M; Tsuchitani Y
    Am J Dent; 1994 Feb; 7(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 9115683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.