161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33338794)
1. Pollution by anthropogenic microfibers in North-West Mediterranean Sea and efficiency of microfiber removal by a wastewater treatment plant.
Pedrotti ML; Petit S; Eyheraguibel B; Kerros ME; Elineau A; Ghiglione JF; Loret JF; Rostan A; Gorsky G
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Mar; 758():144195. PubMed ID: 33338794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microfiber from textile dyeing and printing wastewater of a typical industrial park in China: Occurrence, removal and release.
Zhou H; Zhou L; Ma K
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Oct; 739():140329. PubMed ID: 32758965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tracking the distribution of microfiber pollution in a southern Lake Michigan watershed through the analysis of water, sediment and air.
Peller JR; Eberhardt L; Clark R; Nelson C; Kostelnik E; Iceman C
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2019 Sep; 21(9):1549-1559. PubMed ID: 31363723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of microplastics and microfiber contamination in effluents of the City of Saskatoon wastewater treatment plant.
Prajapati S; Beal M; Maley J; Brinkmann M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 33625707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of microfibers emission from textile washing from a domestic environment.
Sudheshna AA; Srivastava M; Prakash C
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Dec; 852():158511. PubMed ID: 36063944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microfiber release from different fabrics during washing.
Yang L; Qiao F; Lei K; Li H; Kang Y; Cui S; An L
Environ Pollut; 2019 Jun; 249():136-143. PubMed ID: 30884392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are We Underestimating Anthropogenic Microfiber Pollution? A Critical Review of Occurrence, Methods, and Reporting.
Athey SN; Erdle LM
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Apr; 41(4):822-837. PubMed ID: 34289522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atmospheric microfibrous deposition over the Eastern Red Sea coast.
Martynova A; Genchi L; Laptenok SP; Cusack M; Stenchikov GL; Liberale C; Duarte CM
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jan; 907():167902. PubMed ID: 37858811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantity and fate of synthetic microfiber emissions from apparel washing in California and strategies for their reduction.
Geyer R; Gavigan J; Jackson AM; Saccomanno VR; Suh S; Gleason MG
Environ Pollut; 2022 Apr; 298():118835. PubMed ID: 35051547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification and morphological characterization of microfibers emitted from textile washing.
Dreillard M; Barros CF; Rouchon V; Emonnot C; Lefebvre V; Moreaud M; Guillaume D; Rimbault F; Pagerey F
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 832():154973. PubMed ID: 35367554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Research and characterization of fibrous microplastics and natural microfibers in pelagic and benthic fish species of commercial interest.
Santonicola S; Volgare M; Di Pace E; Mercogliano R; Cocca M; Raimo G; Colavita G
Ital J Food Saf; 2023 Mar; 12(1):11032. PubMed ID: 37064521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Domestic laundry and microfiber pollution: Exploring fiber shedding from consumer apparel textiles.
Vassilenko E; Watkins M; Chastain S; Mertens J; Posacka AM; Patankar S; Ross PS
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0250346. PubMed ID: 34242234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microfiber pollution from Dhobi Ghats (open air laundry centers) and commercial laundries in a north Indian city.
Bhat ZM; Gani KM
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; 31(8):12161-12173. PubMed ID: 38225494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anthropogenic particles (including microfibers and microplastics) in marine sediments of the Canadian Arctic.
Adams JK; Dean BY; Athey SN; Jantunen LM; Bernstein S; Stern G; Diamond ML; Finkelstein SA
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Aug; 784():147155. PubMed ID: 34088044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microplastics in wastewater: microfiber emissions from common household laundry.
Galvão A; Aleixo M; De Pablo H; Lopes C; Raimundo J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jul; 27(21):26643-26649. PubMed ID: 32378098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An innovative evaluation method based on polymer mass detection to evaluate the contribution of microfibers from laundry process to municipal wastewater.
Tian Y; Chen Z; Zhang J; Wang Z; Zhu Y; Wang P; Zhang T; Pu J; Sun H; Wang L
J Hazard Mater; 2021 Apr; 407():124861. PubMed ID: 33387971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of treatment chemicals on the morphology and molecular structure of microfibers and microplastic films in wastewater.
Kaur Brar P; Dhir A; Örmeci B
Water Sci Technol; 2023 Nov; 88(9):2201-2214. PubMed ID: 37966177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of bacterial cellulose hydrogel in microfiber removal from contaminated waters: A sustainable approach to wastewater treatment.
Rodrigues F; Faria M; Mendonça I; Sousa E; Ferreira A; Cordeiro N
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Apr; 919():170846. PubMed ID: 38342467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection, characterization and possible biofragmentation of synthetic microfibers released from domestic laundering wastewater as an emerging source of marine pollution.
Mishra S; Dash D; Das AP
Mar Pollut Bull; 2022 Dec; 185(Pt A):114254. PubMed ID: 36306713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of microplastics release from polyester fabrics: The impact of different washing conditions.
Dalla Fontana G; Mossotti R; Montarsolo A
Environ Pollut; 2020 Sep; 264():113960. PubMed ID: 32375087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
