These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33339597)

  • 1. Why the categorization of indexed effective orifice area is not justified for the classification of prosthesis-patient mismatch.
    Vriesendorp MD; Deeb GM; Reardon MJ; Kiaii B; Bapat V; Labrousse L; Rao V; Sabik JF; Gearhart E; Klautz RJM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 164(3):822-829.e6. PubMed ID: 33339597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The fallacy of indexed effective orifice area charts to predict prosthesis-patient mismatch after prosthesis implantation.
    Vriesendorp MD; De Lind Van Wijngaarden RAF; Head SJ; Kappetein AP; Hickey GL; Rao V; Weissman NJ; Reardon MJ; Moront MG; Sabik JF; Klautz RJM
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Oct; 21(10):1116-1122. PubMed ID: 32243493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement in the PARTNER 2 Trial and Registry.
    Ternacle J; Pibarot P; Herrmann HC; Kodali S; Leipsic J; Blanke P; Jaber W; Mack MJ; Clavel MA; Salaun E; Guzzetti E; Annabi MS; Bernier M; Beaudoin J; Khalique OK; Weissman NJ; Douglas P; Bax J; Dahou A; Xu K; Alu M; Rogers E; Leon M; Thourani VH; Abbas AE; Hahn RT
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jul; 14(13):1466-1477. PubMed ID: 34238557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Pre-Existing Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Survival Following Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedures.
    Pibarot P; Simonato M; Barbanti M; Linke A; Kornowski R; Rudolph T; Spence M; Moat N; Aldea G; Mennuni M; Iadanza A; Amrane H; Gaia D; Kim WK; Napodano M; Baumbach H; Finkelstein A; Kobayashi J; Brecker S; Don C; Cerillo A; Unbehaun A; Attias D; Nejjari M; Jones N; Fiorina C; Tchetche D; Philippart R; Spargias K; Hernandez JM; Latib A; Dvir D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 11(2):133-141. PubMed ID: 29348008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in bovine pericardial aortic valves: evaluation using 3 different modalities and associated medium-term outcomes.
    Chacko SJ; Ansari AH; McCarthy PM; Malaisrie SC; Andrei AC; Li Z; Lee R; McGee E; Bonow RO; Puthumana JJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):776-83. PubMed ID: 23926194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of predicted effective orifice area in determining incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Catalano MA; Rutkin B; Koss E; Maurer G; Berg J; Hartman A; Yu PJ
    J Card Surg; 2021 Jan; 36(1):191-196. PubMed ID: 33169868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch after Aortic Valve Replacement with the Mosaic Ultra Bioprosthesis.
    Ntinopoulos V; Biefer HRC; Dushaj S; Rings L; Fleckenstein P; Dzemali O; Haeussler A
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Apr; 72(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 37031679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN™ prosthesis.
    Van Linden A; Kempfert J; Blumenstein J; Rastan A; Holzhey D; Lehmann S; Mohr FW; Walther T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Aug; 61(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 22791205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.
    Head SJ; Reardon MJ; Deeb GM; Van Mieghem NM; Popma JJ; Gleason TG; Williams MR; Radhakrishnan S; Fremes S; Oh JK; Chang Y; Boulware MJ; Kappetein AP
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 12(4):e007396. PubMed ID: 30929507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: A randomized trial of a self-expanding prosthesis.
    Zorn GL; Little SH; Tadros P; Deeb GM; Gleason TG; Heiser J; Kleiman NS; Oh JK; Popma JJ; Adams D; Huang J; Reardon MJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 151(4):1014-22, 1023.e1-3. PubMed ID: 26614412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive hemodynamic performance and frequency of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the St. Jude Medical Trifecta bioprosthetic aortic valve.
    Yadlapati A; Diep J; Barnes MJ; Grogan T; Bethencourt DM; Vorobiof G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Jul; 23(4):516-23. PubMed ID: 25803979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety, efficacy, and hemodynamic performance of a stented bovine pericardial aortic valve bioprosthesis: Two-year analysis.
    Dagenais F; Moront MG; Brown WM; Reardon MJ; Chu MWA; Gearhart E; Klautz RJM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Aug; 160(2):371-381.e4. PubMed ID: 31590957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reclassification of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using predicted vs. measured indexed effective orifice area.
    Ternacle J; Guimaraes L; Vincent F; Côté N; Côté M; Lachance D; Clavel MA; Abbas AE; Pibarot P; Rodés-Cabau J
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jan; 22(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 32995865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient-prosthesis mismatch has no influence on in-hospital mortality after aortic valve replacement.
    Yottasurodom C; Namthaisong K; Porapakkham P; Kasemsarn C; Chotivatanapong T; Chaiseri P; Wongdit S; Yasotarin S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Aug; 95 Suppl 8():S64-70. PubMed ID: 23130477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term outcomes of measured and predicted prosthesis-patient mismatch following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Tomii D; Okuno T; Heg D; Nakase M; Lanz J; Praz F; Stortecky S; Reineke D; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    EuroIntervention; 2023 Nov; 19(9):746-756. PubMed ID: 37622754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between measured and predicted mismatch with valve hemodynamics in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A sex-based analysis.
    Natalis A; Masson JB; Mansour MJ; Asmar MA; Potvin J; Gobeil JF; Riahi M; Noiseux N; Stevens LM; Forcillo J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Sep; 102(3):505-512. PubMed ID: 37449451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging for Predicting and Assessing Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Pibarot P; Magne J; Leipsic J; Côté N; Blanke P; Thourani VH; Hahn R
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jan; 12(1):149-162. PubMed ID: 30621987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of the indexed effective orifice area on mid-term cardiac-related mortality after aortic valve replacement.
    Bleiziffer S; Ali A; Hettich IM; Akdere D; Laubender RP; Ruzicka D; Boehm J; Lange R; Eichinger W
    Heart; 2010 Jun; 96(11):865-71. PubMed ID: 20406767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of different values of prosthesis-patient mismatch on outcome in male patients with aortic valve replacement.
    Mannacio VA; Mannacio L; Antignano A; Pinna GB; Giordano R; Mottola M; Iannelli G
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2017 May; 18(5):366-373. PubMed ID: 28212136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in degenerated bioprostheses.
    Seiffert M; Conradi L; Baldus S; Knap M; Schirmer J; Franzen O; Koschyk D; Meinertz T; Reichenspurner H; Treede H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 143(3):617-24. PubMed ID: 22169448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.