These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33339631)

  • 1. Mind-set - How bias leads to errors in friction ridge comparisons.
    Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110545. PubMed ID: 33339631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing the accuracy and reliability of palmar friction ridge comparisons - A black box study.
    Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110457. PubMed ID: 33239260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():65-75. PubMed ID: 28324769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining and expanding the friction ridge value decision.
    Eldridge H; DeDonno M; Furrer J; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Sep; 314():110408. PubMed ID: 32731198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in latent fingerprint examiners' markup between analysis and comparison.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Feb; 247():54-61. PubMed ID: 25553355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the clarity of friction ridge impressions.
    Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Mar; 226(1-3):106-17. PubMed ID: 23313600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of ordinal outcomes in forensic black-box studies.
    Arora HM; Kaplan-Damary N; Stern HS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jan; 354():111909. PubMed ID: 38104395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel approach for latent print identification using accurate overlays to prioritize reference prints.
    Gantz DT; Gantz DT; Walch MA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Dec; 245():162-70. PubMed ID: 25447189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting suitability of finger marks using machine learning techniques and examiner annotations.
    Eldridge H; De Donno M; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110712. PubMed ID: 33601318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utilizing AFIS searching tools to reduce errors in fingerprint casework.
    Langenburg G; Hall C; Rosemarie Q
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():123-133. PubMed ID: 26295930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterizing missed identifications and errors in latent fingerprint comparisons using eye-tracking data.
    Busey TA; Heise N; Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251674. PubMed ID: 34029319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions?
    Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Ausdemore M; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110542. PubMed ID: 33147525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments.
    Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE; Wertheim K
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 23601721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110179. PubMed ID: 25372036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Genessay T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):183-98. PubMed ID: 22269131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprints.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():89-99. PubMed ID: 27046517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and reproducibility of forensic tire examination decisions.
    Richetelli N; LeMay J; Dunagan KM; Parks CL; Hicklin RA; Chapman WJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 May; 358():112009. PubMed ID: 38581823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Small Population Study on Friction Skin Ridges: Differences in Ridge Widths Between Latent and Inked Fingerprints.
    De Alcaraz-Fossoul J; Tully-Doyle R; Weber AR; Barrot Feixat C; Zapico SC; Rivera Cardenas N; Sirard MJ; Graber RP
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):620-626. PubMed ID: 31599979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.