260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33339870)
1. Evaluation of mutation rates, mosaicism and off target mutations when injecting Cas9 mRNA or protein for genome editing of bovine embryos.
Hennig SL; Owen JR; Lin JC; Young AE; Ross PJ; Van Eenennaam AL; Murray JD
Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):22309. PubMed ID: 33339870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Livestock Gene Editing by One-step Embryo Manipulation.
Navarro-Serna S; Vilarino M; Park I; Gadea J; Ross PJ
J Equine Vet Sci; 2020 Jun; 89():103025. PubMed ID: 32563448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. One-step genome editing of porcine zygotes through the electroporation of a CRISPR/Cas9 system with two guide RNAs.
Hirata M; Wittayarat M; Tanihara F; Sato Y; Namula Z; Le QA; Lin Q; Takebayashi K; Otoi T
In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim; 2020 Sep; 56(8):614-621. PubMed ID: 32978715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Off- and on-target effects of genome editing in mouse embryos.
Ayabe S; Nakashima K; Yoshiki A
J Reprod Dev; 2019 Feb; 65(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 30518723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of concentration of CRISPR/Cas9 components on genetic mosaicism in cytoplasmic microinjected porcine embryos.
Tanihara F; Hirata M; Nguyen NT; LE QA; Hirano T; Otoi T
J Reprod Dev; 2019 Jun; 65(3):209-214. PubMed ID: 30726783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficient genome editing of Brassica campestris based on the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
Xiong X; Liu W; Jiang J; Xu L; Huang L; Cao J
Mol Genet Genomics; 2019 Oct; 294(5):1251-1261. PubMed ID: 31129735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mosaicism in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing.
Mehravar M; Shirazi A; Nazari M; Banan M
Dev Biol; 2019 Jan; 445(2):156-162. PubMed ID: 30359560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gene Therapy with CRISPR/Cas9 Coming to Age for HIV Cure.
Soriano V
AIDS Rev; 2017; 19(3):167-172. PubMed ID: 29019352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-efficiency genome editing using a dmc1 promoter-controlled CRISPR/Cas9 system in maize.
Feng C; Su H; Bai H; Wang R; Liu Y; Guo X; Liu C; Zhang J; Yuan J; Birchler JA; Han F
Plant Biotechnol J; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1848-1857. PubMed ID: 29569825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Timing of CRISPR/Cas9-related mRNA microinjection after activation as an important factor affecting genome editing efficiency in porcine oocytes.
Sato M; Kosuke M; Koriyama M; Inada E; Saitoh I; Ohtsuka M; Nakamura S; Sakurai T; Watanabe S; Miyoshi K
Theriogenology; 2018 Mar; 108():29-38. PubMed ID: 29195121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CRISPR/Cas9-based epigenome editing: An overview of dCas9-based tools with special emphasis on off-target activity.
Tadić V; Josipović G; Zoldoš V; Vojta A
Methods; 2019 Jul; 164-165():109-119. PubMed ID: 31071448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of CRISPR gene-editing tools in zebrafish.
Uribe-Salazar JM; Kaya G; Sekar A; Weyenberg K; Ingamells C; Dennis MY
BMC Genomics; 2022 Jan; 23(1):12. PubMed ID: 34986794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficient edition of the bovine PRNP prion gene in somatic cells and IVF embryos using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
Bevacqua RJ; Fernandez-Martín R; Savy V; Canel NG; Gismondi MI; Kues WA; Carlson DF; Fahrenkrug SC; Niemann H; Taboga OA; Ferraris S; Salamone DF
Theriogenology; 2016 Nov; 86(8):1886-1896.e1. PubMed ID: 27566851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in sea urchins.
Lin CY; Oulhen N; Wessel G; Su YH
Methods Cell Biol; 2019; 151():305-321. PubMed ID: 30948015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficient RNA/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis.
Guo X; Zhang T; Hu Z; Zhang Y; Shi Z; Wang Q; Cui Y; Wang F; Zhao H; Chen Y
Development; 2014 Feb; 141(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 24401372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One-step generation of complete gene knockout mice and monkeys by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing with multiple sgRNAs.
Zuo E; Cai YJ; Li K; Wei Y; Wang BA; Sun Y; Liu Z; Liu J; Hu X; Wei W; Huo X; Shi L; Tang C; Liang D; Wang Y; Nie YH; Zhang CC; Yao X; Wang X; Zhou C; Ying W; Wang Q; Chen RC; Shen Q; Xu GL; Li J; Sun Q; Xiong ZQ; Yang H
Cell Res; 2017 Jul; 27(7):933-945. PubMed ID: 28585534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid and efficient analysis of gene function using CRISPR-Cas9 in Xenopus tropicalis founders.
Shigeta M; Sakane Y; Iida M; Suzuki M; Kashiwagi K; Kashiwagi A; Fujii S; Yamamoto T; Suzuki KT
Genes Cells; 2016 Jul; 21(7):755-71. PubMed ID: 27219625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatiotemporal Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Machinery Using Stimuli-Responsive Vehicles.
Cai W; Luo T; Mao L; Wang M
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2021 Apr; 60(16):8596-8606. PubMed ID: 32385892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Harnessing endogenous repair mechanisms for targeted gene knock-in of bovine embryos.
Owen JR; Hennig SL; McNabb BR; Lin JC; Young AE; Murray JD; Ross PJ; Van Eenennaam AL
Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):16031. PubMed ID: 32994506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Achieving Plant CRISPR Targeting that Limits Off-Target Effects.
Wolt JD; Wang K; Sashital D; Lawrence-Dill CJ
Plant Genome; 2016 Nov; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 27902801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
