403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33341285)
1. Is Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Cost-effective in Prostate Cancer: An Analysis Informed by the proPSMA Trial.
de Feria Cardet RE; Hofman MS; Segard T; Yim J; Williams S; Francis RJ; Frydenberg M; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy DG; De Abreu Lourenco R
Eur Urol; 2021 Mar; 79(3):413-418. PubMed ID: 33341285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective randomized multicentre study of the impact of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging for staging high-risk prostate cancer prior to curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA study): clinical trial protocol.
Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Williams SG; Nzenza T; Herschtal A; Lourenco RA; Bailey DL; Budd R; Hicks RJ; Francis RJ; Lawrentschuk N
BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):783-793. PubMed ID: 29726071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is PSMA PET/CT cost-effective for the primary staging in prostate cancer? First results for European countries and the USA based on the proPSMA trial.
Holzgreve A; Unterrainer M; Calais J; Adams T; Oprea-Lager DE; Goffin K; Lopci E; Unterrainer LM; Kramer KKM; Schmidt-Hegemann NS; Casuscelli J; Stief CG; Ricke J; Bartenstein P; Kunz WG; Mehrens D
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Oct; 50(12):3750-3754. PubMed ID: 37428216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) for the Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer in Australia.
Song R; Jeet V; Sharma R; Hoyle M; Parkinson B
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Aug; 40(8):807-821. PubMed ID: 35761117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Imaging for Initial Staging of Treatment-naïve Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-center Study.
Lenis AT; Pooli A; Lec PM; Sadun TY; Johnson DC; Lebacle C; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Czernin J; Reiter RE; Calais J
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32958451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7.
Esen T; Falay O; Tarim K; Armutlu A; Koseoglu E; Kilic M; Seymen H; Sarikaya AF; Kiremit MC; Balbay MD; Canda AE; Baydar DE; Kordan Y; Demirkol MO; Tilki D
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):288-293. PubMed ID: 33509671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Chow KM; So WZ; Lee HJ; Lee A; Yap DWT; Takwoingi Y; Tay KJ; Tuan J; Thang SP; Lam W; Yuen J; Lawrentschuk N; Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Chen K
Eur Urol; 2023 Jul; 84(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 37032189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study.
Hofman MS; Lawrentschuk N; Francis RJ; Tang C; Vela I; Thomas P; Rutherford N; Martin JM; Frydenberg M; Shakher R; Wong LM; Taubman K; Ting Lee S; Hsiao E; Roach P; Nottage M; Kirkwood I; Hayne D; Link E; Marusic P; Matera A; Herschtal A; Iravani A; Hicks RJ; Williams S; Murphy DG;
Lancet; 2020 Apr; 395(10231):1208-1216. PubMed ID: 32209449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of metastatic disease on
Yaxley JW; Raveenthiran S; Nouhaud FX; Samaratunga H; Yaxley WJ; Coughlin G; Yaxley AJ; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D
BJU Int; 2019 Sep; 124(3):401-407. PubMed ID: 31141284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modelling Study with an Interactive Model Assessing the Cost-effectiveness of
Scholte M; Barentsz JO; Sedelaar JPM; Gotthardt M; Grutters JPC; Rovers MM
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):967-974. PubMed ID: 30826284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Is Associated with Improved Oncological Outcome in Men Treated with Salvage Radiation Therapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
Meijer D; Eppinga WSC; Mohede RM; Vanneste BGL; Meijnen P; Meijer OWM; Daniels LA; van den Bergh RCN; Lont AP; Ettema RH; Oudshoorn FHK; van Leeuwen PJ; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Oprea-Lager DE; Schaake EE; Vis AN
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 5(2):146-152. PubMed ID: 35074282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography with Gallium-68-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Detects Relapse After Vascular-targeted Photodynamic Therapy in a Prostate Cancer Model.
Alvim R; Nagar K; Das S; Lebdai S; Wong N; Somma A; Hughes C; Thomas J; Monette S; Scherz A; Kim K; Grimm J; Coleman JA
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):472-478. PubMed ID: 31227464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Five-year trends of bone scan and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography utilization in prostate cancer: A retrospective review in a private centre.
Haran C; McBean R; Parsons R; Wong D
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 63(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 30972933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Trial Protocol for PRIMARY2: A Multicentre, Phase 3, Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Additive Diagnostic Value of [
Buteau JP; Moon D; Fahey MT; Roberts MJ; Thompson J; Murphy DG; Papa N; Mitchell C; De Abreu Lourenco R; Dhillon HM; Kasivisvanathan V; Francis RJ; Stricker P; Agrawal S; O'Brien J; McVey A; Sharma G; Levy S; Ayati N; Nguyen A; Lee SF; Pattison DA; Sivaratnam D; Frydenberg M; Du Y; Titus J; Lee ST; Ischia J; Jack G; Hofman MS; Emmett L
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Jun; 7(3):544-552. PubMed ID: 38061976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [
Hirmas N; Al-Ibraheem A; Herrmann K; Alsharif A; Muhsin H; Khader J; Al-Daghmin A; Salah S
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Jun; 21(3):574-581. PubMed ID: 30215174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective Evaluation of
Lopci E; Lughezzani G; Castello A; Saita A; Colombo P; Hurle R; Peschechera R; Benetti A; Zandegiacomo S; Pasini L; Casale P; Pietro D; Bevilacqua G; Balzarini L; Buffi NM; Guazzoni G; Lazzeri M
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jul; 7(4):764-771. PubMed ID: 32312701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
