BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33341812)

  • 1. Acute Alcohol Intake Deteriorates Hearing Thresholds and Speech Perception in Noise.
    Choi HG; Hong SK; Lee HJ; Chang J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(4):218-225. PubMed ID: 33341812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrimination of degrees of auditory performance from the digits-in-noise test based on hearing status.
    Armstrong NM; Oosterloo BC; Croll PH; Ikram MA; Goedegebure A
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 59(12):897-904. PubMed ID: 32673129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Relationship between Random Gap Detection and Hearing in Noise Test Performances.
    Heeke P; Vermiglio AJ; Bulla E; Velappan K; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):948-954. PubMed ID: 30479267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
    Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing Loss in Children With Otitis Media With Effusion: Actual and Simulated Effects on Speech Perception.
    Cai T; McPherson B; Li C; Yang F
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):645-655. PubMed ID: 29176394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the possible effect of magnetic resonance imaging noise on peripheral hearing organ with the otoacoustic emission.
    Turay CB; Ozer F; Yildirim T; Erbek S
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(6):102586. PubMed ID: 32629148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimal and Mild Hearing Loss in Children: Association with Auditory Perception, Cognition, and Communication Problems.
    Moore DR; Zobay O; Ferguson MA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):720-732. PubMed ID: 31633598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal Processing and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingual Adult Users of Cochlear Implants.
    Cesur S; Derinsu U
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Feb; 31(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 31429401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
    Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of Measures Intended to Assess Threshold-Independent Hearing Disorders.
    Kamerer AM; Kopun JG; Fultz SE; Neely ST; Rasetshwane DM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1267-1279. PubMed ID: 30882533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal processing in low-frequency channels: effects of age and hearing loss in middle-aged listeners.
    Leigh-Paffenroth ED; Elangovan S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):393-404. PubMed ID: 21993047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating a smartphone digits-in-noise test as part of the audiometric test battery.
    Potgieter JM; Swanepoel W; Smits C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 May; 65(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29781704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.