146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33342013)
1. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Gratitude at Work Scale (GAWS).
Komase Y; Watanabe K; Sasaki N; Kawakami N
J Occup Health; 2020 Jan; 62(1):e12185. PubMed ID: 33342013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Japanese Workplace PERMA-Profiler: A validation study among Japanese workers.
Watanabe K; Kawakami N; Shiotani T; Adachi H; Matsumoto K; Imamura K; Matsumoto K; Yamagami F; Fusejima A; Muraoka T; Kagami T; Shimazu A; L Kern M
J Occup Health; 2018 Sep; 60(5):383-393. PubMed ID: 30122730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Internal consistency, convergent validity, and structural validity of the Japanese version of the Physical Activity Self-Regulation scale (PASR-12) among Japanese workers: A validation study.
Watanabe K; Kawakami N; Adachi H; Inoue S; Meyer MR
J Occup Health; 2017 Jan; 59(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 27885244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Feedback Environment Scale (FES-J) for workers.
Momotani H; Otsuka Y
Ind Health; 2019 Jun; 57(3):326-341. PubMed ID: 30089763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers.
Ochiai Y; Otsuka Y
Ind Health; 2022 Oct; 60(5):436-446. PubMed ID: 34819405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.
Tran TTT; Watanabe K; Imamura K; Nguyen HT; Sasaki N; Kuribayashi K; Sakuraya A; Nguyen NT; Bui TM; Nguyen QT; Truong TQ; Nguyen GTH; Minas H; Tsustumi A; Shimazu A; Kawakami N
J Occup Health; 2020 Jan; 62(1):e12157. PubMed ID: 32827229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of a Newly Developed Gratitude Intervention Program on Work Engagement Among Japanese Workers: A Pre- and Posttest Study.
Komase Y; Watanabe K; Imamura K; Kawakami N
J Occup Environ Med; 2019 Sep; 61(9):e378-e383. PubMed ID: 31306267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Workplace incivility in Japan: Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the modified Work Incivility Scale.
Tsuno K; Kawakami N; Shimazu A; Shimada K; Inoue A; P Leiter M
J Occup Health; 2017 May; 59(3):237-246. PubMed ID: 28302927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and validation of the Japanese version of the team job crafting scale for nurses.
Iida M; Watanabe K; Imamura K; Sakuraya A; Asaoka H; Sato N; Nozawa K; Kawakami N
Res Nurs Health; 2021 Apr; 44(2):329-343. PubMed ID: 33512763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing workplace civility: Validity and 1-year test-retest reliability of a Japanese version of the CREW Civility Scale.
Tsuno K; Shimazu A; Osatuke K; Shimada K; Ando E; Inoue A; Kurioka S; Kawakami N
J Occup Health; 2022 Jan; 64(1):e12332. PubMed ID: 35434891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.
Meng R; Li J; Wang Z; Zhang D; Liu B; Luo Y; Hu Y; Yu C
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Mar; 18(1):70. PubMed ID: 32169070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcultural validation of the return-to-work self-efficacy scale in Korean patients with work-related injuries.
Lee JE; Yoo SB; Leigh JH
BMC Public Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):844. PubMed ID: 32493252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring eudemonic well-being at work: a validation study for the 24-item the University of Tokyo Occupational Mental Health (TOMH) well-being scale among Japanese workers.
Watanabe K; Imamura K; Inoue A; Otsuka Y; Shimazu A; Eguchi H; Adachi H; Sakuraya A; Kobayashi Y; Arima H; Kawakami N
Ind Health; 2020 Apr; 58(2):107-131. PubMed ID: 31366851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement properties and implications of the Brief Resilience Scale in healthy workers.
Soer R; Six Dijkstra MWMC; Bieleman HJ; Stewart RE; Reneman MF; Oosterveld FGJ; Schreurs KMG
J Occup Health; 2019 May; 61(3):242-250. PubMed ID: 30903648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The psychometric properties of the 5-item gratitude questionnaire in Chinese adolescents.
Zeng Y; Ling Y; Huebner ES; He Y; Lei X
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2017 May; 24(4):203-210. PubMed ID: 28140495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the weight bias internalization scale.
Endo S; Kasuga H; Yusuke M; Hidaka T; Kakamu T; Fukushima T
BMC Res Notes; 2022 Oct; 15(1):333. PubMed ID: 36273190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring workplace bullying: reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the negative acts questionnaire.
Tsuno K; Kawakami N; Inoue A; Abe K
J Occup Health; 2010; 52(4):216-26. PubMed ID: 20571253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the active-emphatic listening scale.
Asai K; Hiraizumi T; Hanzawa R
BMC Psychol; 2020 Jun; 8(1):59. PubMed ID: 32527312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire (New BJSQ) among workers in China.
Hidaka Y; Watanabe K; Imamura K; Tatha O; Kawakami N
Ind Health; 2022 Oct; 60(5):407-419. PubMed ID: 34719579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of the Collective Gratitude on Work Engagement: A Multilevel Cross-sectional Study.
Komase Y; Akiyama H; Kawakami N
J Occup Environ Med; 2022 Nov; 64(11):e729-e735. PubMed ID: 35993606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
