These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33342614)

  • 21. Computerized adaptive testing for the Oxford Hip, Knee, Shoulder, and Elbow scores : accurate measurement from fewer, and more patient-focused, questions.
    Harrison CJ; Plummer OR; Dawson J; Jenkinson C; Hunt A; Rodrigues JN
    Bone Jt Open; 2022 Oct; 3(10):786-794. PubMed ID: 36222103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validity of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand patient-reported outcome measure (DASH) and the Quickdash when used in Dupuytren's disease.
    Rodrigues J; Zhang W; Scammell B; Russell P; Chakrabarti I; Fullilove S; Davidson D; Davis T
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2016 Jul; 41(6):589-99. PubMed ID: 26307142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Concurrent validity study of QuickDASH with respect to DASH in patients with traumatic upper extremity amputation.
    Pyörny J; Sletten IN; Jokihaara J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Jan; 25(1):86. PubMed ID: 38263085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computerized adaptive testing of psychological factors: relation to upper-extremity disability.
    Menendez ME; Bot AG; Hageman MG; Neuhaus V; Mudgal CS; Ring D
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Oct; 95(20):e149. PubMed ID: 24132364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Construct validity, reliability, response rate, and association with disease activity of the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis.
    Ochi K; Iwamoto T; Saito A; Ikari K; Toyama Y; Taniguchi A; Yamanaka H; Momohara S
    Mod Rheumatol; 2015 Mar; 25(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 25065918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating Factors Associated With Patient-Perceived Applicability of the QuickDASH Survey in Reflecting Their Goals of Care Prior to Hand Surgery.
    Siebert MJ; Roca H; Maughan G; Monson HW; Kazmers NH
    J Hand Surg Am; 2024 Jan; 49(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 37952144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the PROMIS and QuickDASH Instruments in a Nonshoulder Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Population.
    Kazmers NH; Qiu Y; Yoo M; Stephens AR; Tyser AR; Zhang Y
    J Hand Surg Am; 2020 May; 45(5):399-407.e6. PubMed ID: 31955997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test in the upper extremity.
    Tyser AR; Beckmann J; Franklin JD; Cheng C; Hon SD; Wang A; Hung M
    J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Oct; 39(10):2047-2051.e4. PubMed ID: 25135249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
    van Kampen DA; Willems WJ; van Beers LW; Castelein RM; Scholtes VA; Terwee CB
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Nov; 8():40. PubMed ID: 24225254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Establishing the Patient Acceptable Symptom State in a Nonshoulder Hand and Upper Extremity Population for the QuickDASH and PROMIS UE Computer Adaptive Tests.
    Hubbard J; Rogers MJ; Cizik AM; Zhang C; Presson AP; Kazmers NH
    J Hand Surg Am; 2024 Mar; 49(3):282.e1-282.e12. PubMed ID: 36116991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function.
    Gabel CP; Yelland M; Melloh M; Burkett B
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2009 Dec; 10():161. PubMed ID: 20021677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the French version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand in shoulder disorders.
    Fayad F; Lefevre-Colau MM; Gautheron V; Macé Y; Fermanian J; Mayoux-Benhamou A; Roren A; Rannou F; Roby-Brami A; Revel M; Poiraudeau S
    Man Ther; 2009 Apr; 14(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 18436467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Linguistic validation, validity and reliability of the British English versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and QuickDASH in people with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Hammond A; Prior Y; Tyson S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Apr; 19(1):118. PubMed ID: 29661183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimal Clinically Important Difference After Carpal Tunnel Release Using the PROMIS Platform.
    Kazmers NH; Hung M; Bounsanga J; Voss MW; Howenstein A; Tyser AR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2019 Nov; 44(11):947-953.e1. PubMed ID: 31072663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lower Quadrant Edema Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Is Reliable, Valid, and Efficient for Patients With Lymphatic and Venous Disorders.
    Deutscher D; Kallen MA; Hayes D; Werneke MW; Mioduski JE; Levenhagen K; Pfarr M; Cook KF
    Phys Ther; 2023 Oct; 103(10):. PubMed ID: 37682087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Association of Physical Function, Anxiety, and Pain Interference in Nonshoulder Upper Extremity Patients Using the PROMIS Platform.
    Kazmers NH; Hung M; Rane AA; Bounsanga J; Weng C; Tyser AR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2017 Oct; 42(10):781-787. PubMed ID: 28890332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Nepali version of the DASH (disability of arm, shoulder and hand) in patients with shoulder pain.
    Kc S; Sharma S; Ginn K; Almadi T; Subedi H; Reed D
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Mar; 17(1):51. PubMed ID: 30898138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments.
    Sorensen AA; Howard D; Tan WH; Ketchersid J; Calfee RP
    J Hand Surg Am; 2013 Apr; 38(4):641-9. PubMed ID: 23481405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) in Hand Surgery: Does a One-Question Outcome Instrument Compare Favorably?
    Gire JD; Koltsov JCB; Segovia NA; Kenney DE; Yao J; Ladd AL
    J Hand Surg Am; 2020 Jul; 45(7):589-596. PubMed ID: 32482496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What Is the Most Useful Questionnaire for Measurement of Coping Strategies in Response to Nociception?
    Kortlever JT; Janssen SJ; van Berckel MM; Ring D; Vranceanu AM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3511-8. PubMed ID: 26105152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.