118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33342781)
1. Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk: Evaluation using volumetric breast density software.
Koshi S; Singla V; Singh T; Prabhakar N; Bal A; Singh G
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(6):1258-1264. PubMed ID: 33342781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts.
Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Lee CI; Akslen LA; Tsuruda KM; Elmore JG; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 29944088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic breast density, its changes, and breast cancer risk in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Kim EY; Chang Y; Ahn J; Yun JS; Park YL; Park CH; Shin H; Ryu S
Cancer; 2020 Nov; 126(21):4687-4696. PubMed ID: 32767699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High volumetric breast density predicts risk for breast cancer in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, Korean Women.
Park IH; Ko K; Joo J; Park B; Jung SY; Lee S; Kwon Y; Kang HS; Lee ES; Lee KS; Ro J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec; 21(13):4124-32. PubMed ID: 24934582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of area- and volumetric-mammographic density and breast cancer risk in women of Asian descent: a case control study.
Mariapun S; Ho WK; Eriksson M; Mohd Taib NA; Yip CH; Rahmat K; Hall P; Teo SH
Breast Cancer Res; 2024 May; 26(1):79. PubMed ID: 38750574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated volumetric breast density measures: differential change between breasts in women with and without breast cancer.
Brandt KR; Scott CG; Miglioretti DL; Jensen MR; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Hruska C; Ma L; Wu FF; Cummings SR; Norman AD; Engmann NJ; Shepherd JA; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Oct; 21(1):118. PubMed ID: 31660981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women.
Sawada T; Akashi S; Nakamura S; Kuwayama T; Enokido K; Yoshida M; Hashimoto R; Ide T; Masuda H; Taruno K; Oyama H; Takamaru T; Kanada Y; Ikeda M; Kosugi N; Sato H; Nakayama S; Ata A; Tonouchi Y; Sakai H; Matsunaga Y; Matsutani A
Breast Cancer; 2017 Sep; 24(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 28238177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.
Astley SM; Harkness EF; Sergeant JC; Warwick J; Stavrinos P; Warren R; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Howell T; Evans DG
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29402289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Circulating Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-κB (RANK), RANK ligand (RANKL), and Mammographic Density in Premenopausal Women.
Toriola AT; Appleton CM; Zong X; Luo J; Weilbaecher K; Tamimi RM; Colditz GA
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2018 Dec; 11(12):789-796. PubMed ID: 30352839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the prediction performance for breast cancer risk based on volumetric mammographic density at different thresholds.
Wang C; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Harkness EF; Evans DG; Astley S
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Jun; 20(1):49. PubMed ID: 29884207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Gastounioti A; Kasi CD; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Wu FF; Norman AD; Conant EF; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Kontos D; Vachon CM
Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32396041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic non-dense area and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: a causal inference approach in a case-control study.
Velásquez García HA; Sobolev BG; Gotay CC; Wilson CM; Lohrisch CA; Lai AS; Aronson KJ; Spinelli JJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(1):159-168. PubMed ID: 29516373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association of the Interaction Between Mammographic Breast Density, Body Mass Index, and Menopausal Status With Breast Cancer Risk Among Korean Women.
Tran TXM; Moon SG; Kim S; Park B
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Dec; 4(12):e2139161. PubMed ID: 34940866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parenchymal pattern in women with dense breasts. Variation with age and impact on screening outcomes: observations from a UK screening programme.
Ward L; Heller S; Hudson S; Wilkinson L
Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4717-4724. PubMed ID: 29808426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density.
Holm J; Humphreys K; Li J; Ploner A; Cheddad A; Eriksson M; Törnberg S; Hall P; Czene K
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(9):1030-7. PubMed ID: 25646195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study.
Wanders JOP; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N; Holland K; Kallenberg M; Peeters PHM; Nielsen M; Lillholm M
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 May; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 29720220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of factors on mammographic density in premenopausal Chinese women.
Yang Y; Liu J; Gu R; Hu Y; Liu F; Yun M; Xiao Q; Wu M; Liu Q; Su F
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2016 Jul; 25(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 26075657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.
Mandelson MT; Oestreicher N; Porter PL; White D; Finder CA; Taplin SH; White E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Jul; 92(13):1081-7. PubMed ID: 10880551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
