138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33342921)
1. Impact of polymerization and storage on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of veneering resin composites.
Mayinger F; Reymus M; Liebermann A; Richter M; Kubryk P; Großekappenberg H; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater J; 2021 Mar; 40(2):487-497. PubMed ID: 33342921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chemical and mechanical properties of dual-polymerizing core build-up materials.
Kelch M; Stawarczyk B; Mayinger F
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jul; 26(7):4885-4896. PubMed ID: 35344103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Time-dependent degree of conversion, Martens parameters, and flexural strength of different dual-polymerizing resin composite luting materials.
Kelch M; Stawarczyk B; Mayinger F
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):1067-1076. PubMed ID: 34342762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical and optical properties of indirect veneering resin composites after different aging regimes.
Stawarczyk B; Brauneis M; Langwieder B; Spintzyk S; Eichberger M; Liebermann A
Dent Mater J; 2021 Mar; 40(2):279-287. PubMed ID: 33208573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flexural strength, fracture toughness, three-body wear, and Martens parameters of pressable lithium-X-silicate ceramics.
Stawarczyk B; Dinse L; Eichberger M; Jungbauer R; Liebermann A
Dent Mater; 2020 Mar; 36(3):420-430. PubMed ID: 32007315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of varnishing, coating, and polishing on the chemical and mechanical properties of a 3D printed resin and two veneering composite resins.
Lask M; Stawarczyk B; Reymus M; Meinen J; Mayinger F
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38797579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of printing orientation and artificial ageing on martens hardness and indentation modulus of 3D printed restorative resin materials.
Mudhaffer S; Althagafi R; Haider J; Satterthwaite J; Silikas N
Dent Mater; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1003-1014. PubMed ID: 38735775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D-printed material for temporary restorations: impact of print layer thickness and post-curing method on degree of conversion.
Reymus M; Lümkemann N; Stawarczyk B
Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 31463487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro study on the influence of postpolymerization and aging on the Martens parameters of 3D-printed occlusal devices.
Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):817-823. PubMed ID: 32444206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and degree of conversion of 3D printed splint material.
Perea-Lowery L; Gibreel M; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104254. PubMed ID: 33333480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations.
Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of curing mode on the conversion and IIT-derived mechanical properties of core build-up resin composites.
Dimitriadi M; Petropoulou A; Anagnostou M; Zafiropoulou M; Zinelis S; Eliades G
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Nov; 123():104757. PubMed ID: 34375795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of artificial aging on Martens hardness and indentation modulus of different dental CAD/CAM restorative materials.
Hampe R; Lümkemann N; Sener B; Stawarczyk B
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Oct; 86():191-198. PubMed ID: 29986293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Water-induced Effects on the Hardness and Modulus of Contemporary Sealants Derived from Instrumented Indentation Testing (IIT).
Diener V; Zinelis S; Eliades T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jun; 20(6):653-656. PubMed ID: 31358704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Resin-based composite light-cured properties assessed by laboratory standards and simulated clinical conditions.
Ilie N; Bauer H; Draenert M; Hickel R
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 22788727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of physico-mechanical properties and filler particles characterization of conventional, bulk-fill, and bioactive resin-based composites.
Gomes de Araújo-Neto V; Sebold M; Fernandes de Castro E; Feitosa VP; Giannini M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104288. PubMed ID: 33383377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High performance dental resin composites with hydrolytically stable monomers.
Wang X; Huyang G; Palagummi SV; Liu X; Skrtic D; Beauchamp C; Bowen R; Sun J
Dent Mater; 2018 Feb; 34(2):228-237. PubMed ID: 29113700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites.
Leprince JG; Palin WM; Vanacker J; Sabbagh J; Devaux J; Leloup G
J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):993-1000. PubMed ID: 24874951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of Different Postpolymerization Strategies and Artificial Aging on Hardness of 3D-Printed Resin Materials: An In Vitro Study.
Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(6):634-640. PubMed ID: 33284905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of in vitro aging on the mechanical and optical properties of indirect veneering composite resins.
Stawarczyk B; Egli R; Roos M; Ozcan M; Hämmerle CH
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):386-98. PubMed ID: 22133396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
