These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33344191)
1. Study of corneal biomechanical properties in patients with childhood glaucoma. Caride SG; González LP; Francés FS; Feijoo JG Int J Ophthalmol; 2020; 13(12):1922-1927. PubMed ID: 33344191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes. Tian L; Wang D; Wu Y; Meng X; Chen B; Ge M; Huang Y Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 25639340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Influence factors and differences of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam system combined with Corvis ST]. Peng YS; Chen M; Tian L; Li H; Li DW; Zhang FF Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 56(2):110-117. PubMed ID: 32074821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology]. Coste V; Schweitzer C; Paya C; Touboul D; Korobelnik JF J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 25976131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal biomechanical properties in healthy children measured by corneal visualization scheimpflug technology. He M; Ding H; He H; Zhang C; Liu L; Zhong X BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 17(1):70. PubMed ID: 28514942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Li Y; Tian L; Guo LL; Hao Y; Jie Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():863240. PubMed ID: 35497328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Corneal Parameters in Healthy Subjects Assessed by Corvis ST. Salouti R; Bagheri M; Shamsi A; Zamani M J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2020; 15(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32095205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Novel Parameter of Corneal Biomechanics That Differentiate Normals From Glaucoma. Lee R; Chang RT; Wong IY; Lai JS; Lee JW; Singh K J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):e603-9. PubMed ID: 26035421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Corneal Deformation Parameters Provided by the Corvis-ST Pachy-Tonometer in Healthy Subjects and Glaucoma Patients. Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Felletti M; Grasso L; Brusini P J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):568-74. PubMed ID: 25318572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variability of Corneal Deformation Response in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes. Ye C; Yu M; Lai G; Jhanji V Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):e149-53. PubMed ID: 26002009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal Biomechanical Parameters and Asymmetric Visual Field Damage in Patients with Untreated Normal Tension Glaucoma. Li BB; Cai Y; Pan YZ; Li M; Qiao RH; Fang Y; Tian T Chin Med J (Engl); 2017 Feb; 130(3):334-339. PubMed ID: 28139518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Varying Severities of Myopia. Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Azimi A; Fakhimi Z; Ziaei M; Danesh Z; Roberts CJ; Monfared N; Jamali A Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2020; 8():595330. PubMed ID: 33553113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the corneal biomechanics in pseudoexfoliation syndrome, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and healthy controls using Corvis® Scheimpflug Technology. Pradhan ZS; Deshmukh S; Dixit S; Gudetti P; Devi S; Webers CAB; Rao HL Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 68(5):787-792. PubMed ID: 32317447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after collagen cross-linking in patients with keratoconus. Salouti R; Khalili MR; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Nowroozzadeh MH J Curr Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 31(3):262-267. PubMed ID: 31528759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Study on corneal biomechanical properties of suspicious keratoconus patients in corneal topography]. Zhang YH; Wang Y; Li LY; Zhang L; Wei PH Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 55(6):442-447. PubMed ID: 31189274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison among Ocular Response Analyzer, Corvis ST and Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy children. Salouti R; Alishiri AA; Gharebaghi R; Naderi M; Jadidi K; Shojaei-Baghini A; Talebnejad M; Nasiri Z; Hosseini S; Heidary F Int J Ophthalmol; 2018; 11(8):1330-1336. PubMed ID: 30140637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Alterations in intraocular pressure and the CorVis parameters after LASIK]. Anton A; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Wecker T; Lübke J; Heinzelmann S; Lapp T; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; Maier P Ophthalmologe; 2017 May; 114(5):445-449. PubMed ID: 27620918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okumichi H PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238395. PubMed ID: 32966284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative analysis of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure with corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology versus conventional noncontact intraocular pressure. Ma J; Wang Y; Hao W; Jhanji V Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31432352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Novel Indentation Assessment to Measure Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension. Xu Y; Ye Y; Chong IT; Chen Z; Xu J; Yang Y; Yu K; Lam DCC; Yu M Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Aug; 10(9):36. PubMed ID: 34459861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]