286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33345815)
1. Maternal and neonatal outcomes with mechanical cervical dilation plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical ripening; a systematic review of literature and metaanalysis.
Nasioudis D; Kim SW; Schoen C; Levine LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2019 May; 1(2):101-111. PubMed ID: 33345815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intracervical Foley catheter plus intravaginal misoprostol compared to intravaginal misoprostol-only for cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yin J; Li Y; Chen Y; Wang C; Song X
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Feb; 281():76-84. PubMed ID: 36566685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Carbone JF; Tuuli MG; Fogertey PJ; Roehl KA; Macones GA
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 121(2 Pt 1):247-252. PubMed ID: 23303106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.
Viteri OA; Tabsh KK; Alrais MA; Salazar XC; Lopez JM; Fok RY; Chauhan SP; Sibai BM
Am J Perinatol; 2021 Aug; 38(S 01):e123-e128. PubMed ID: 32299108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis.
Lee HH; Huang BS; Cheng M; Yeh CC; Lin IC; Horng HC; Huang HY; Lee WL; Wang PH
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 32168947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening.
Chen W; Xue J; Gaudet L; Walker M; Wen SW
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 129(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 25794821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misoprostol With Foley Bulb Compared With Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Al-Ibraheemi Z; Brustman L; Bimson BE; Porat N; Rosenn B
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 29215514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical ripening before first trimester surgical evacuation for non-viable pregnancy.
Webber K; Grivell RM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 2015(11):CD009954. PubMed ID: 26559875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Misoprostol combined with cervical single or double balloon catheters versus misoprostol alone for labor induction of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Ornat L; Alonso-Ventura V; Bueno-Notivol J; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Oct; 33(20):3453-3468. PubMed ID: 30741051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical ripening agents in the second trimester of pregnancy in women with a scarred uterus: a systematic review and metaanalysis of observational studies.
Andrikopoulou M; Lavery JA; Ananth CV; Vintzileos AM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):177-94. PubMed ID: 27018469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD000941. PubMed ID: 12535398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.
McMaster K; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24989790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Labor Induction Outcomes with Outpatient Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening among Low-Risk Women.
Kandahari N; Schneider AN; Tucker LS; Raine-Bennett TR; Mohta VJ
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e818-e826. PubMed ID: 36130669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.
Rust OA; Greybush M; Atlas RO; Jones KJ; Balducci J
J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 11725734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].
Oliveira MV; Oberst PV; Leite GK; Aguemi A; Kenj G; Leme VD; Sass N
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 32(7):346-51. PubMed ID: 21152844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
