These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33345913)
41. Predicting factors on cervical ripening and response to induction in women pregnant over 37 weeks. Bahadori F; Ayatollahi H; Naghavi-Behzad M; Khalkhali H; Naseri Z Med Ultrason; 2013 Sep; 15(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 23979614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cervical length and maternal factors in expectantly managed prolonged pregnancy: prediction of onset of labor and mode of delivery. Rao A; Celik E; Poggi S; Poon L; Nicolaides KH; Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):646-51. PubMed ID: 18816476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Prediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Eggebø TM; Gjessing LK; Heien C; Smedvig E; Økland I; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 16565994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Prediction of mode of delivery by an ultrasound score similar to Bishop score and performance of independent predictors. Manchu M; Redla V J Ultrasound; 2023 Sep; 26(3):619-626. PubMed ID: 35622298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction]. Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The validity of ultrasonography in predicting the outcomes of labour induction. Alvarez-Colomo C; Gobernado-Tejedor JA Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Feb; 293(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 26066659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction. Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: the role of pre- and postripening ultrasound examination of the cervix. Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Tomera S; Scandroglio S; Colombo G; Bolis P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 196(1):41.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17240227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Relationship between detection of the cervical gland area during the late third trimester and necessity for induction of labor to prevent post-term delivery. Minami Y; Sekiya T; Nishizawa H; Miyazaki J; Noda Y; Ishii R; Yasue A; Nishio E; Udagawa Y; Fujii T J Med Ultrason (2001); 2014 Oct; 41(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 27278027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Predictive factors for vaginal delivery by induction of labor in uncomplicated pregnancies at 40-41 gestational weeks: A Japanese prospective single-center cohort study. Hosoya S; Maeda Y; Ogawa K; Umehara N; Ozawa N; Sago H J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Mar; 49(3):920-929. PubMed ID: 36594583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The cervix as a predictor of preterm delivery in 'at-risk' women. Cook CM; Ellwood DA Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 10775991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Ultrasonographic score for predicting vaginal delivery within 24h of induction: a pilot study]. Ancel J; Huissoud C Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Mar; 43(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 25727164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Use of cervical ultrasonography in prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin gestations. Guzman ER; Walters C; O'reilly-Green C; Kinzler WL; Waldron R; Nigam J; Vintzileos AM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1103-7. PubMed ID: 11084549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Predicting labor induction success by cervical funneling in uncomplicated pregnancies. Kim YN; Kwon JY; Kim EH J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1077-1083. PubMed ID: 32390283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Midpregnancy Cervical Length in Nulliparous Women and its Association with Postterm Delivery and Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery. van der Ven AJ; van Os MA; Kleinrouweler CE; Verhoeven CJ; de Miranda E; Bossuyt PM; de Groot CJ; Haak MC; Pajkrt E; Mol BW; Kazemier BM Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jan; 33(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 26115020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction. Gómez Laencina AM; Sánchez FG; Gimenez JH; Martínez MS; Valverde Martínez JA; Vizcaíno VM Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 17611824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of the cervix for predicting time to spontaneous onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy. Rovas L; Sladkevicius P; Strobel E; De Smet F; De Moor B; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 16817172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Uterocervical angle: an ultrasound screening tool to predict satisfactory response to labor induction. Eser A; Ozkaya E J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Apr; 33(8):1295-1301. PubMed ID: 30249147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Ultrasound examination at 37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of pregnancy outcome: the value of cervical assessment. Ramanathan G; Yu C; Osei E; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Dec; 22(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 14689532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The value of ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix in predicting post-term pregnancy. Vimercati A; Greco P; Lopalco P; Loizzi V; Scioscia M; Mei L; Rossi AC; Selvaggi L J Perinat Med; 2001; 29(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 11565200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]