These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33346156)

  • 1. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
    Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
    Chan AK; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Michalopoulos GD; Guan J; Haid RW; Agarwal N; Park C; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E2. PubMed ID: 36587409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kuo CH; Huang WC; Wu JC; Tu TH; Fay LY; Wu CL; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 29856306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic factors associated with best outcomes (minimal symptom state) following fusion for lumbar degenerative conditions.
    Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Djurasovic M; Owens RK; Gum JL; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2019 Feb; 19(2):187-190. PubMed ID: 29960112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective, randomized controlled multicenter study of posterior lumbar facet arthroplasty for the treatment of spondylolisthesis.
    Coric D; Nassr A; Kim PK; Welch WC; Robbins S; DeLuca S; Whiting D; Chahlavi A; Pirris SM; Groff MW; Chi JH; Huang JH; Kent R; Whitmore RG; Meyer SA; Arnold PM; Patel AI; Orr RD; Krishnaney A; Boltes P; Anekstein Y; Steinmetz MP
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Jan; 38(1):115-125. PubMed ID: 36152329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
    Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Shaffrey CI; Wang MY; Park P; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Sep; 87(3):555-562. PubMed ID: 32409828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    He D; He W; Tian W; Liu B; Liu Y; Sun Y; Xing Y; Lang Z; Wang Y; Ma T; Liu M
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Jun; 15(6):1477-1487. PubMed ID: 37154089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with stenosis.
    Cheng X; Zhang K; Sun X; Zhao C; Li H; Ni B; Zhao J
    Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1127-1133. PubMed ID: 28416439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Prospective comparative study of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Wu D; Shu T; Lu Q; Shen M
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 May; 38(5):521-528. PubMed ID: 38752236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Topping-off Surgery
    Liao HC; Wu YC; Wang PW; Chung MH; Hueng DY; Chen KY; Tseng KY
    In Vivo; 2023; 37(4):1838-1846. PubMed ID: 37369487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Levin JM; Tanenbaum JE; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Overley SC
    Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1088-1098. PubMed ID: 29452283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does loss of spondylolisthesis reduction impact clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Steinhaus ME; Vaishnav AS; Shah SP; Clark NJ; Chaudhary CB; Othman YA; Urakawa H; Samuel AM; Lovecchio FC; Sheha ED; McAnany SJ; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2022 Jan; 22(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 34118417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
    Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 58.