145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33348219)
1. Relaxing the assumption of unrelatedness in the numerator and denominator of likelihood ratios for DNA mixtures.
Allen PS; Pugh SN; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Curran JM; Kerr Z; Buckleton JS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Mar; 51():102434. PubMed ID: 33348219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of likelihood ratios with and without assuming relatedness for DNA mixtures interpreted using a continuous model.
Kruijver M; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jan; 62():102800. PubMed ID: 36372011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring likelihood ratios assigned for siblings of the true mixture contributor as an alternate contributor.
Kelly H; Coble M; Kruijver M; Wivell R; Bright JA
J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1167-1175. PubMed ID: 35211970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing multiple POI to DNA mixtures.
Hicks T; Kerr Z; Pugh S; Bright JA; Curran J; Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102481. PubMed ID: 33607394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation into the effect of mixtures comprising related people on non-donor likelihood ratios, and potential practises to mitigate providing misleading opinions.
Kalafut T; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102691. PubMed ID: 35390645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():1-16. PubMed ID: 27914277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. When evaluating DNA evidence within a likelihood ratio framework, should the propositions be exhaustive?
Buckleton J; Taylor D; Bright JA; Hicks T; Curran J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102406. PubMed ID: 33142191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.
Slooten KJ; Egeland T
Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 26160753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Investigation into Compound Likelihood Ratios for Forensic DNA Mixtures.
Wivell R; Kelly H; Kokoszka J; Daniels J; Dickson L; Buckleton J; Bright JA
Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching.
Bright JA; Taylor D; Kerr Z; Buckleton J; Kruijver M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():64-71. PubMed ID: 30986620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. About the power of biostatistics in sibling analysis-comparison of empirical and simulated data.
von Wurmb-Schwark N; Podruks E; Schwark T; Göpel W; Fimmers R; Poetsch M
Int J Legal Med; 2015 Nov; 129(6):1201-9. PubMed ID: 26292643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The analogy between DNA kinship and DNA mixture evaluation, with applications for the interpretation of likelihood ratios produced by possibly imperfect models.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102449. PubMed ID: 33517022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying common donors in DNA mixtures, with applications to database searches.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jan; 26():40-47. PubMed ID: 27780107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calculating likelihood ratios for a mixed DNA profile when a contribution from a genetic relative of a suspect is proposed.
Puch-Solis R; Pope S; Evett I
Sci Justice; 2010 Dec; 50(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 21075300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A large-scale validation of NOCIt's a posteriori probability of the number of contributors and its integration into forensic interpretation pipelines.
Grgicak CM; Karkar S; Yearwood-Garcia X; Alfonse LE; Duffy KR; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102296. PubMed ID: 32339916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
