200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33349523)
21. Protocol for a national cohort study to explore the long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness of implant-based and autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: the brighter study.
Johnson L; Holcombe C; O'Donoghue JM; Jeevan R; Browne J; Fairbrother P; MacKenzie M; Gulliver-Clarke C; White P; Mohiuddin S; Hollingworth W; Potter S
BMJ Open; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e054055. PubMed ID: 34408062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-term complications and reconstruction failures in previously radiated breast cancer patients receiving salvage mastectomy with autologous reconstruction or tissue expander/implant-based reconstruction.
Manyam BV; Shah C; Woody NM; Reddy CA; Weller MA; Juloori A; Naik M; Valente S; Grobmyer S; Durand P; Djohan R; Tendulkar RD
Breast J; 2019 Nov; 25(6):1071-1078. PubMed ID: 31264293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Silicone versus Saline Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using the BREAST-Q.
Siotos C; Sarmiento S; McColl M; Sacks JM; Manahan MA; Rosson GD; Cooney CM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Feb; 143(2):276e-284e. PubMed ID: 30489499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Dutch randomized controlled study shows autologous fat transfer with pre-expansion is more cost-effective in the long term than implants.
Wederfoort JLM; Voeten N; Smeins NNPM; Hommes JE; Essers BAB; van der Hulst RRWJ; Piatkowski A;
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Sep; 84():398-412. PubMed ID: 37399660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Post-Mastectomy Tissue Expander Placement Followed by Radiation Therapy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Staged Autologous Versus Implant-Based Unilateral Reconstruction.
Bloom JA; Shah SA; Long EA; Chatterjee A; Lee BT
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 36348205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Propensity-matched, longitudinal outcomes analysis of complications and cost: comparing abdominal free flaps and implant-based breast reconstruction.
Fischer JP; Wes AM; Nelson JA; Basta M; Rohrbach JI; Wu LC; Serletti JM; Kovach SJ
J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Aug; 219(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 24916480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The use of AlloDerm in postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: part II. A cost analysis.
Jansen LA; Macadam SA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Jun; 127(6):2245-2254. PubMed ID: 21617459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction compared to total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zehra S; Doyle F; Barry M; Walsh S; Kell MR
Breast Cancer; 2020 Jul; 27(4):534-566. PubMed ID: 32162181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost comparison of mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer.
Barlow WE; Taplin SH; Yoshida CK; Buist DS; Seger D; Brown M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Mar; 93(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 11259470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Economic analysis and review of the literature on implant-based breast reconstruction with and without the use of the acellular dermal matrix.
Bank J; Phillips NA; Park JE; Song DH
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Dec; 37(6):1194-201. PubMed ID: 24091489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost comparison of immediate one-stage and tissue-expander breast reconstructions after mastectomy in commercially insured patients.
Singh NK; Reaven NL; Funk SE
Manag Care; 2013 Mar; 22(3):36-43. PubMed ID: 23610805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal-based perforator free flaps.
Tran BNN; Fadayomi A; Lin SJ; Singhal D; Lee BT
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):439-447. PubMed ID: 28591940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Patterns and outcomes of breast reconstruction in older women - A systematic review of the literature.
Oh DD; Flitcroft K; Brennan ME; Spillane AJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 42(5):604-15. PubMed ID: 26965305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiation Therapy Versus No Radiation Therapy to the Neo-breast Following Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Autologous Free Flap Reconstruction for Breast Cancer: Patient-Reported and Surgical Outcomes at 1 Year-A Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) Substudy.
Cooke AL; Diaz-Abele J; Hayakawa T; Buchel E; Dalke K; Lambert P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Sep; 99(1):165-172. PubMed ID: 28816143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is Single-Stage Prosthetic Reconstruction Cost Effective? A Cost-Utility Analysis for the Use of Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Relative to Expander-Implant Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Patients.
Krishnan NM; Fischer JP; Basta MN; Nahabedian MY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Sep; 138(3):537-547. PubMed ID: 27556599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparing five alternative methods of breast reconstruction surgery: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Grover R; Padula WV; Van Vliet M; Ridgway EB
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Nov; 132(5):709e-723e. PubMed ID: 24165623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction.
Krishnan NM; Chatterjee A; Rosenkranz KM; Powell SG; Nigriny JF; Vidal DC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24508194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Single Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Has Lower Complication Rates Than Tissue Expander and Implant and Comparable Rates to Autologous Reconstruction in Patients Receiving Postmastectomy Radiation.
Naoum GE; Salama L; Niemierko A; Vieira BL; Belkacemi Y; Colwell AS; Winograd J; Smith B; Ho A; Taghian AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Mar; 106(3):514-524. PubMed ID: 31756414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Utility and Cost Effectiveness of Routine, Histologic Evaluation of the Mastectomy Scar in Two-Stage, Implant-Based Reconstruction during Expander-to-Implant Exchange.
Fishman JE; Pang JHY; Dabbs D; De La Cruz C
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Dec; 142(6):836e-839e. PubMed ID: 30489512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
