523 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33350890)
1. Imaging Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors with Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Bahl M; Mercaldo S; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2021 Feb; 298(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 33350890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital 2D versus Tomosynthesis Screening Mammography among Women Aged 65 and Older in the United States.
Bahl M; Pinnamaneni N; Mercaldo S; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):582-590. PubMed ID: 30938625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. False-Negative Rates of Breast Cancer Screening with and without Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Durand MA; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Copit DS; Barke LD; Rose SL; Hayes MK; Greer LN; Dabbous FM; Conant EF
Radiology; 2021 Feb; 298(2):296-305. PubMed ID: 33258744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Are Initial Benefits Sustained?
Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Dang PA; McCarthy AM; Lowry KP; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2020 Jun; 295(3):529-539. PubMed ID: 32255414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening Mammography Performance Metrics of 2D Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
Chikarmane SA; Cochon LR; Khorasani R; Sahu S; Giess CS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):587-594. PubMed ID: 32966113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Interval and Subsequent Round Breast Cancer in a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screening.
Hofvind S; Moshina N; Holen ÅS; Danielsen AS; Lee CI; Houssami N; Aase HS; Akslen LA; Haldorsen IS
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 33973840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Addition of Screening Breast US to Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk.
Yi A; Jang MJ; Yim D; Kwon BR; Shin SU; Chang JM
Radiology; 2021 Mar; 298(3):568-575. PubMed ID: 33434108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening.
Østerås BH; Martinsen ACT; Gullien R; Skaane P
Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 31407968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Community-Based Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Comparison of Screening Performance and Tumor Characteristics.
Regen-Tuero HC; Ram S; Gass JS; Lourenco AP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Feb; 218(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 34523954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Performance in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer, 2007-2016.
Lee JM; Ichikawa LE; Wernli KJ; Bowles E; Specht JM; Kerlikowske K; Miglioretti DL; Lowry KP; Tosteson ANA; Stout NK; Houssami N; Onega T; Buist DSM
Radiology; 2021 Aug; 300(2):290-300. PubMed ID: 34003059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast Cancer Characteristics Associated with 2D Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Screening-detected and Interval Cancers.
Bahl M; Gaffney S; McCarthy AM; Lowry KP; Dang PA; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 29272213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Mammographic Screening Modality on Breast Density Assessment: Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Gastounioti A; McCarthy AM; Pantalone L; Synnestvedt M; Kontos D; Conant EF
Radiology; 2019 May; 291(2):320-327. PubMed ID: 30888933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen Norway.
Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lång K; Albertsen JL; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Sahlberg KK; Skaane P; Suhrke P; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):256-264. PubMed ID: 31821118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast Cancer Conspicuity on Simultaneously Acquired Digital Mammographic Images versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
Korhonen KE; Conant EF; Cohen EA; Synnestvedt M; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31084481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Radiologist Learning Curve.
Miglioretti DL; Abraham L; Lee CI; Buist DSM; Herschorn SD; Sprague BL; Henderson LM; Tosteson ANA; Kerlikowske K;
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 30806595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
