BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33351832)

  • 1. Perceptual harmony in judgments of group prototypicality and intragroup respect.
    Wright JD; Climenhage LJ; Schmitt MT; Branscombe NR
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243821. PubMed ID: 33351832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the crucial role of mental ingroup representation for ingroup bias and the ingroup prototypicality-ingroup bias link.
    Machunsky M; Meiser T; Mummendey A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 19289357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Complex inclusive categories of positive and negative valence and prototypicality claims in asymmetric intergroup relations.
    Alexandre JD; Waldzus S; Wenzel M
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2016 Sep; 55(3):457-83. PubMed ID: 27346031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Group status is related to group prototypicality in the absence of social identity concerns.
    Rubin M
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(3):386-9. PubMed ID: 22558832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Boundaries of American Identity: Relations between Ethnic Group Prototypicality and Policy Attitudes.
    Huynh QL; Devos T; Altman HR
    Polit Psychol; 2015 Aug; 36(4):449-468. PubMed ID: 26347578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Respect for group members: intragroup determinants of collective identification and group-serving behavior.
    Simon B; Stürmer S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Feb; 29(2):183-93. PubMed ID: 15272946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Newcomers to Social Categories: Longitudinal Predictors and Consequences of Ingroup Identification.
    van Veelen R; Eisenbeiss KK; Otten S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Jun; 42(6):811-25. PubMed ID: 27460273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural processing of prototypicality and simplicity of product design in forming design preferences.
    Cho E; Yoon SA; Park HJ
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0297148. PubMed ID: 38241423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind.
    Winkielman P; Halberstadt J; Fazendeiro T; Catty S
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Sep; 17(9):799-806. PubMed ID: 16984298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The infamous among us: Enhanced reputational memory for uncooperative ingroup members.
    Hechler S; Neyer FJ; Kessler T
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():1-13. PubMed ID: 27568585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. They (Don't) Need Us: Functional Indispensability Impacts Perceptions of Representativeness and Commitment When Lower-Status Groups Go Through an Intergroup Merger.
    Rosa M; Giessner S; Guerra R; Waldzus S; Kersting AM; Veličković K; Collins EC
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2772. PubMed ID: 31993001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncertainty reduction, self-enhancement, and ingroup identification.
    Reid SA; Hogg MA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jun; 31(6):804-17. PubMed ID: 15833907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inferring category attributes from exemplar attributes: geometric shapes and social categories.
    Rothbart M; Lewis S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1988 Dec; 55(6):861-72. PubMed ID: 3216287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can Peripheral Group Members Not Represent the In-Group? The Effect of Member Prototypicality on Intergroup Conflict.
    Hong X; Liu P; Zhu Z; Lv H; Liu S; Zhang L
    Psychol Rep; 2023 Nov; ():332941231212646. PubMed ID: 37934125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When less equal is less human: Intragroup (dis)respect and the experience of being human.
    Renger D; Mommert A; Renger S; Simon B
    J Soc Psychol; 2016; 156(5):553-63. PubMed ID: 26744814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aspirational leaders help us change: Ingroup prototypicality enables effective group psychotherapy leadership.
    Robertson AM; Cruwys T; Stevens M; Platow MJ
    Br J Clin Psychol; 2023 Mar; 62(1):243-259. PubMed ID: 36458503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Framing social judgment: self-ingroup comparison and perceived discrimination.
    Quinn KA; Olson JM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Feb; 29(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 15272950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The carrot and the stick: affective commitment and acceptance anxiety as motives for discretionary group efforts by respected and disrespected group members.
    Sleebos E; Ellemers N; de Gilder D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Feb; 32(2):244-55. PubMed ID: 16382085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Group member prototypicality and intergroup negotiation: how one's standing in the group affects negotiation behaviour.
    Van Kleef GA; Steinel W; van Knippenberg D; Hogg MA; Svensson A
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2007 Mar; 46(Pt 1):129-52. PubMed ID: 17355722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implicit ingroup metafavoritism: subtle preference for ingroup members displaying ingroup bias.
    Castelli L; Tomelleri S; Zogmaister C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 18359956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.